From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>, rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 14/18] rcu: Conditionally build CPU-hotplug teardown callbacks
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 13:58:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231013115902.1059735-15-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231013115902.1059735-1-frederic@kernel.org>
Among the three CPU-hotplug teardown RCU callbacks, two of them early
exit if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n, and one is left unchanged. In any case
all of them have an implementation when CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n.
Align instead with the common way to deal with CPU-hotplug teardown
callbacks and provide a proper stub when they are not supported.
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/rcutree.h | 11 +++-
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 153cfc7bbffd..46875c4e9f56 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -110,9 +110,16 @@ void rcu_all_qs(void);
/* RCUtree hotplug events */
int rcutree_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
int rcutree_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
-int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
+void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
int rcutree_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
int rcutree_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
-void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu);
+int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
+#else
+#define rcutree_dead_cpu NULL
+#define rcutree_dying_cpu NULL
+#define rcutree_offline_cpu NULL
+#endif
#endif /* __LINUX_RCUTREE_H */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 2e1e7eadf2cc..f9c6b2680cbb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4237,25 +4237,6 @@ static bool rcu_init_invoked(void)
return !!rcu_state.n_online_cpus;
}
-/*
- * Near the end of the offline process. Trace the fact that this CPU
- * is going offline.
- */
-int rcutree_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- bool blkd;
- struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
- struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
-
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU))
- return 0;
-
- blkd = !!(READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) & rdp->grpmask);
- trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_seq),
- blkd ? TPS("cpuofl-bgp") : TPS("cpuofl"));
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* All CPUs for the specified rcu_node structure have gone offline,
* and all tasks that were preempted within an RCU read-side critical
@@ -4301,23 +4282,6 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dead_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp_leaf)
}
}
-/*
- * The CPU has been completely removed, and some other CPU is reporting
- * this fact from process context. Do the remainder of the cleanup.
- * There can only be one CPU hotplug operation at a time, so no need for
- * explicit locking.
- */
-int rcutree_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU))
- return 0;
-
- WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.n_online_cpus, rcu_state.n_online_cpus - 1);
- // Stop-machine done, so allow nohz_full to disable tick.
- tick_dep_clear(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* Propagate ->qsinitmask bits up the rcu_node tree to account for the
* first CPU in a given leaf rcu_node structure coming online. The caller
@@ -4470,29 +4434,6 @@ int rcutree_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
return 0;
}
-/*
- * Near the beginning of the process. The CPU is still very much alive
- * with pretty much all services enabled.
- */
-int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
- struct rcu_data *rdp;
- struct rcu_node *rnp;
-
- rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
- rnp = rdp->mynode;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
- rnp->ffmask &= ~rdp->grpmask;
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
-
- rcutree_affinity_setting(cpu, cpu);
-
- // nohz_full CPUs need the tick for stop-machine to work quickly
- tick_dep_set(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* Mark the specified CPU as being online so that subsequent grace periods
* (both expedited and normal) will wait on it. Note that this means that
@@ -4646,7 +4587,60 @@ void rcutree_migrate_callbacks(int cpu)
cpu, rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist),
rcu_segcblist_first_cb(&rdp->cblist));
}
-#endif
+
+/*
+ * The CPU has been completely removed, and some other CPU is reporting
+ * this fact from process context. Do the remainder of the cleanup.
+ * There can only be one CPU hotplug operation at a time, so no need for
+ * explicit locking.
+ */
+int rcutree_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.n_online_cpus, rcu_state.n_online_cpus - 1);
+ // Stop-machine done, so allow nohz_full to disable tick.
+ tick_dep_clear(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Near the end of the offline process. Trace the fact that this CPU
+ * is going offline.
+ */
+int rcutree_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ bool blkd;
+ struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
+ struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
+
+ blkd = !!(READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) & rdp->grpmask);
+ trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_seq),
+ blkd ? TPS("cpuofl-bgp") : TPS("cpuofl"));
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Near the beginning of the process. The CPU is still very much alive
+ * with pretty much all services enabled.
+ */
+int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ struct rcu_data *rdp;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp;
+
+ rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
+ rnp = rdp->mynode;
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+ rnp->ffmask &= ~rdp->grpmask;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+
+ rcutree_affinity_setting(cpu, cpu);
+
+ // nohz_full CPUs need the tick for stop-machine to work quickly
+ tick_dep_set(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
/*
* On non-huge systems, use expedited RCU grace periods to make suspend
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-13 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-13 11:58 [PATCH 00/18] RCU fixes for v6.7 Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 01/18] Revert "checkpatch: Error out if deprecated RCU API used" Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 02/18] srcu: Fix error handling in init_srcu_struct_fields() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 03/18] rcu/tree: Remove superfluous return from void call_rcu* functions Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 04/18] rcu: Add sysfs to provide throttled access to rcu_barrier() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 05/18] rcu: Remove unused function declaration rcu_eqs_special_set() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 06/18] mm: Remove kmem_valid_obj() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 07/18] rcu: Dump memory object info if callback function is invalid Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 08/18] rcu: Eliminate rcu_gp_slow_unregister() false positive Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 09/18] srcu: Fix srcu_struct node grpmask overflow on 64-bit systems Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 12:54 ` David Laight
2023-10-13 14:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 10/18] rcu: kmemleak: Ignore kmemleak false positives when RCU-freeing objects Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 11/18] rcu: Use rcu_segcblist_segempty() instead of open coding it Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 12/18] rcu: Assume IRQS disabled from rcu_report_dead() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 13/18] rcu: Assume rcu_report_dead() is always called locally Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 15/18] rcu: Standardize explicit CPU-hotplug calls Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:59 ` [PATCH 16/18] rcu: Comment why callbacks migration can't wait for CPUHP_RCUTREE_PREP Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:59 ` [PATCH 17/18] srcu: Fix callbacks acceleration mishandling Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:59 ` [PATCH 18/18] srcu: Only accelerate on enqueue time Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231013115902.1059735-15-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.