From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
oliver.sang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix NULL pointer deref due to filtering on fork
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 14:01:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231013120105.GH29570@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231011051225.3674436-1-anjali.k.kulkarni@oracle.com>
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:12:25PM -0700, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> cn_netlink_send_mult() should be called with filter & filter_data only
> for EXIT case. For all other events, filter & filter_data should be
> NULL.
>
> Fixes: 2aa1f7a1f47c ("connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> Closes: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202309201456.84c19e27-oliver.sang@intel.com__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!PgqlHq_nOe_KlyKkB9Mm_S8QstTJvicjuENwskatuuQK05KPuFw-KvRZeOH8iuEAMjRhkxEMPKJJnLcaT8zrPf9aqNs$
For the record, this got a bit mangled. I believe it should be:
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202309201456.84c19e27-oliver.sang@intel.com/
Also, there is probably no need to resend because of this,
but no blank line here, please.
> Signed-off-by: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/connector/cn_proc.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
> index 05d562e9c8b1..01e17f18d187 100644
> --- a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
> +++ b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
> @@ -104,13 +104,13 @@ static inline void send_msg(struct cn_msg *msg)
> if (filter_data[0] == PROC_EVENT_EXIT) {
> filter_data[1] =
> ((struct proc_event *)msg->data)->event_data.exit.exit_code;
> + cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, 0, CN_IDX_PROC, GFP_NOWAIT,
> + cn_filter, (void *)filter_data);
> } else {
> - filter_data[1] = 0;
> + cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, 0, CN_IDX_PROC, GFP_NOWAIT,
> + NULL, NULL);
> }
>
> - cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, 0, CN_IDX_PROC, GFP_NOWAIT,
> - cn_filter, (void *)filter_data);
> -
I am wondering if you considered making cn_filter slightly smarter.
It seems it already understands not to do very much for PROC_EVENT_ALL.
> local_unlock(&local_event.lock);
> }
>
> --
> 2.42.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-13 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-11 5:12 [PATCH v2] Fix NULL pointer deref due to filtering on fork Anjali Kulkarni
2023-10-13 12:01 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-10-13 16:16 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-10-13 23:01 ` Anjali Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231013120105.GH29570@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=anjali.k.kulkarni@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.