From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: anshuman.khandual@arm.com,ardb@kernel.org,broonie@kernel.org,catalin.marinas@arm.com,ebiederm@xmission.com,f.fainelli@gmail.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,haibinzhang@tencent.com,hewenliang4@huawei.com,james.morse@arm.com,joey.gouly@arm.com,linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,mark.rutland@arm.com,peterz@infradead.org,ruanjinjie@huawei.com,sashal@kernel.org,scott@os.amperecomputing.com,stable@kernel.org,will@kernel.org,youngmin.nam@samsung.com,yuzenghui@huawei.com
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "arm64: armv8_deprecated: move aarch32 helper earlier" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 10:02:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023101623-purchase-number-e29f@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231011100545.979577-14-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm64: armv8_deprecated: move aarch32 helper earlier
to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arm64-armv8_deprecated-move-aarch32-helper-earlier.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From ruanjinjie@huawei.com Wed Oct 11 12:07:12 2023
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 10:05:43 +0000
Subject: arm64: armv8_deprecated: move aarch32 helper earlier
To: <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>, <youngmin.nam@samsung.com>, <ardb@kernel.org>, <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>, <sashal@kernel.org>, <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>, <ebiederm@xmission.com>, <haibinzhang@tencent.com>, <hewenliang4@huawei.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <stable@kernel.org>
Cc: <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20231011100545.979577-14-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
commit 0c5f416219da3795dc8b33e5bb7865a6b3c4e55c upstream.
Subsequent patches will rework the logic in armv8_deprecated.c.
In preparation for subsequent changes, this patch moves some shared logic
earlier in the file. This will make subsequent diffs simpler and easier to
read.
At the same time, drop the `__kprobes` annotation from
aarch32_check_condition(), as this is only used for traps from compat
userspace, and has no risk of recursion within kprobes. As this is the
last kprobes annotation in armve8_deprecated.c, we no longer need to
include <asm/kprobes.h>.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221019144123.612388-9-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
#include <asm/sysreg.h>
#include <asm/system_misc.h>
#include <asm/traps.h>
-#include <asm/kprobes.h>
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include "trace-events-emulation.h"
@@ -52,6 +51,25 @@ struct insn_emulation {
int max;
};
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL 0
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS 1
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND 2
+
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND 0xf
+
+static unsigned int aarch32_check_condition(u32 opcode, u32 psr)
+{
+ u32 cc_bits = opcode >> 28;
+
+ if (cc_bits != ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND) {
+ if ((*aarch32_opcode_cond_checks[cc_bits])(psr))
+ return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS;
+ else
+ return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL;
+ }
+ return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND;
+}
+
/*
* Implement emulation of the SWP/SWPB instructions using load-exclusive and
* store-exclusive.
@@ -138,25 +156,6 @@ static int emulate_swpX(unsigned int add
return res;
}
-#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL 0
-#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS 1
-#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND 2
-
-#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND 0xf
-
-static unsigned int __kprobes aarch32_check_condition(u32 opcode, u32 psr)
-{
- u32 cc_bits = opcode >> 28;
-
- if (cc_bits != ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND) {
- if ((*aarch32_opcode_cond_checks[cc_bits])(psr))
- return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS;
- else
- return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL;
- }
- return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND;
-}
-
/*
* swp_handler logs the id of calling process, dissects the instruction, sanity
* checks the memory location, calls emulate_swpX for the actual operation and
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ruanjinjie@huawei.com are
queue-5.10/arm64-factor-insn-read-out-of-call_undef_hook.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-rework-el0-mrs-emulation.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-die-pass-err-as-long.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-armv8_deprecated-rework-deprected-instruction-handling.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-armv8_deprecated-fix-unused-function-error.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-armv8_deprecated-move-aarch32-helper-earlier.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-consistently-pass-esr_elx-to-die.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-factor-out-el1-ssbs-emulation-hook.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-report-el1-undefs-better.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-armv8_deprecated-fold-ops-into-insn_emulation.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-rework-bti-exception-handling.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-rework-fpac-exception-handling.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-split-el0-el1-undef-handlers.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-allow-kprobes-on-el0-handlers.patch
queue-5.10/arm64-armv8_deprecated-move-emulation-functions.patch
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-16 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-11 10:05 [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 00/15] arm64: Fix a concurrency issue in emulation_proc_handler() Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 01/15] arm64: report EL1 UNDEFs better Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` Patch "arm64: report EL1 UNDEFs better" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 02/15] arm64: die(): pass 'err' as long Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` Patch "arm64: die(): pass 'err' as long" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 03/15] arm64: consistently pass ESR_ELx to die() Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` Patch "arm64: consistently pass ESR_ELx to die()" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 04/15] arm64: rework FPAC exception handling Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` Patch "arm64: rework FPAC exception handling" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 05/15] arm64: rework BTI exception handling Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` Patch "arm64: rework BTI exception handling" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 06/15] arm64: allow kprobes on EL0 handlers Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` Patch "arm64: allow kprobes on EL0 handlers" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 07/15] arm64: split EL0/EL1 UNDEF handlers Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` Patch "arm64: split EL0/EL1 UNDEF handlers" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 08/15] arm64: factor out EL1 SSBS emulation hook Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` Patch "arm64: factor out EL1 SSBS emulation hook" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 09/15] arm64: factor insn read out of call_undef_hook() Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` Patch "arm64: factor insn read out of call_undef_hook()" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 10/15] arm64: rework EL0 MRS emulation Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` Patch "arm64: rework EL0 MRS emulation" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 11/15] arm64: armv8_deprecated: fold ops into insn_emulation Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` Patch "arm64: armv8_deprecated: fold ops into insn_emulation" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 12/15] arm64: armv8_deprecated move emulation functions Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` Patch "arm64: armv8_deprecated move emulation functions" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 13/15] arm64: armv8_deprecated: move aarch32 helper earlier Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` gregkh [this message]
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 14/15] arm64: armv8_deprecated: rework deprected instruction handling Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` Patch "arm64: armv8_deprecated: rework deprected instruction handling" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2023-10-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 15/15] arm64: armv8_deprecated: fix unused-function error Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-11 10:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2023-10-16 8:02 ` Patch "arm64: armv8_deprecated: fix unused-function error" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023101623-purchase-number-e29f@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=haibinzhang@tencent.com \
--cc=hewenliang4@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=youngmin.nam@samsung.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.