All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thinker.li@gmail.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
	drosen@google.com
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
	Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/9] bpf: validate value_type
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:23:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231017162306.176586-5-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231017162306.176586-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>

From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>

A value_type should consist of three components: refcnt, state, and data.
refcnt and state has been move to struct bpf_struct_ops_common_value to
make it easier to check the value type.

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index b561245fe235..69703584fa4a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -20,9 +20,11 @@ enum bpf_struct_ops_state {
 	BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY,
 };
 
-#define BPF_STRUCT_OPS_COMMON_VALUE			\
-	refcount_t refcnt;				\
-	enum bpf_struct_ops_state state
+struct bpf_struct_ops_common_value {
+	refcount_t refcnt;
+	enum bpf_struct_ops_state state;
+};
+#define BPF_STRUCT_OPS_COMMON_VALUE struct bpf_struct_ops_common_value common
 
 struct bpf_struct_ops_value {
 	BPF_STRUCT_OPS_COMMON_VALUE;
@@ -109,6 +111,38 @@ const struct bpf_prog_ops bpf_struct_ops_prog_ops = {
 };
 
 static const struct btf_type *module_type;
+static const struct btf_type *common_value_type;
+
+static bool is_valid_value_type(struct btf *btf, s32 value_id,
+				const struct btf_type *type,
+				const char *value_name)
+{
+	const struct btf_member *member;
+	const struct btf_type *vt, *mt;
+
+	vt = btf_type_by_id(btf, value_id);
+	if (btf_vlen(vt) != 2) {
+		pr_warn("The number of %s's members should be 2, but we get %d\n",
+			value_name, btf_vlen(vt));
+		return false;
+	}
+	member = btf_type_member(vt);
+	mt = btf_type_by_id(btf, member->type);
+	if (mt != common_value_type) {
+		pr_warn("The first member of %s should be bpf_struct_ops_common_value\n",
+			value_name);
+		return false;
+	}
+	member++;
+	mt = btf_type_by_id(btf, member->type);
+	if (mt != type) {
+		pr_warn("The second member of %s should be %s\n",
+			value_name, btf_name_by_offset(btf, type->name_off));
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
 
 static void bpf_struct_ops_init_one(struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops,
 				    struct btf *btf,
@@ -130,14 +164,6 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_init_one(struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops,
 	}
 	sprintf(value_name, "%s%s", VALUE_PREFIX, st_ops->name);
 
-	value_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, value_name,
-					 BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
-	if (value_id < 0) {
-		pr_warn("Cannot find struct %s in btf_vmlinux\n",
-			value_name);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	type_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, st_ops->name,
 					BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
 	if (type_id < 0) {
@@ -152,6 +178,16 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_init_one(struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops,
 		return;
 	}
 
+	value_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, value_name,
+					 BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
+	if (value_id < 0) {
+		pr_warn("Cannot find struct %s in btf_vmlinux\n",
+			value_name);
+		return;
+	}
+	if (!is_valid_value_type(btf, value_id, t, value_name))
+		return;
+
 	for_each_member(i, t, member) {
 		const struct btf_type *func_proto;
 
@@ -201,7 +237,7 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_init_one(struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops,
 void bpf_struct_ops_init(struct btf *btf, struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
 {
 	struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops;
-	s32 module_id;
+	s32 module_id, common_value_id;
 	u32 i;
 
 	/* Ensure BTF type is emitted for "struct bpf_struct_ops_##_name" */
@@ -215,6 +251,14 @@ void bpf_struct_ops_init(struct btf *btf, struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
 		return;
 	}
 	module_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, module_id);
+	common_value_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf,
+						"bpf_struct_ops_common_value",
+						BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
+	if (common_value_id < 0) {
+		pr_warn("Cannot find struct common_value in btf_vmlinux\n");
+		return;
+	}
+	common_value_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, common_value_id);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_struct_ops); i++) {
 		st_ops = bpf_struct_ops[i];
@@ -278,7 +322,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 
 	kvalue = &st_map->kvalue;
 	/* Pair with smp_store_release() during map_update */
-	state = smp_load_acquire(&kvalue->state);
+	state = smp_load_acquire(&kvalue->common.state);
 	if (state == BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INIT) {
 		memset(value, 0, map->value_size);
 		return 0;
@@ -289,7 +333,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 	 */
 	uvalue = value;
 	memcpy(uvalue, st_map->uvalue, map->value_size);
-	uvalue->state = state;
+	uvalue->common.state = state;
 
 	/* This value offers the user space a general estimate of how
 	 * many sockets are still utilizing this struct_ops for TCP
@@ -297,7 +341,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 	 * should sufficiently meet our present goals.
 	 */
 	refcnt = atomic64_read(&map->refcnt) - atomic64_read(&map->usercnt);
-	refcount_set(&uvalue->refcnt, max_t(s64, refcnt, 0));
+	refcount_set(&uvalue->common.refcnt, max_t(s64, refcnt, 0));
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -408,7 +452,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	if (uvalue->state || refcount_read(&uvalue->refcnt))
+	if (uvalue->common.state || refcount_read(&uvalue->common.refcnt))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	tlinks = kcalloc(BPF_TRAMP_MAX, sizeof(*tlinks), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -420,7 +464,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 
 	mutex_lock(&st_map->lock);
 
-	if (kvalue->state != BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INIT) {
+	if (kvalue->common.state != BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INIT) {
 		err = -EBUSY;
 		goto unlock;
 	}
@@ -533,7 +577,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 		 *
 		 * Pair with smp_load_acquire() during lookup_elem().
 		 */
-		smp_store_release(&kvalue->state, BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY);
+		smp_store_release(&kvalue->common.state, BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY);
 		goto unlock;
 	}
 
@@ -551,7 +595,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 		 * It ensures the above udata updates (e.g. prog->aux->id)
 		 * can be seen once BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE is set.
 		 */
-		smp_store_release(&kvalue->state, BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE);
+		smp_store_release(&kvalue->common.state, BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE);
 		goto unlock;
 	}
 
@@ -582,7 +626,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 	if (st_map->map.map_flags & BPF_F_LINK)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	prev_state = cmpxchg(&st_map->kvalue.state,
+	prev_state = cmpxchg(&st_map->kvalue.common.state,
 			     BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE,
 			     BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_TOBEFREE);
 	switch (prev_state) {
@@ -676,7 +720,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	struct bpf_map *map;
 	int ret;
 
-	st_ops = bpf_struct_ops_find_value(attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id, btf_vmlinux);
+	st_ops = bpf_struct_ops_find_value(btf_vmlinux, attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id);
 	if (!st_ops)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
 
@@ -805,7 +849,7 @@ static bool bpf_struct_ops_valid_to_reg(struct bpf_map *map)
 	return map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS &&
 		map->map_flags & BPF_F_LINK &&
 		/* Pair with smp_store_release() during map_update */
-		smp_load_acquire(&st_map->kvalue.state) == BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY;
+		smp_load_acquire(&st_map->kvalue.common.state) == BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY;
 }
 
 static void bpf_struct_ops_map_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-17 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-17 16:22 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/9] Registrating struct_ops types from modules thinker.li
2023-10-17 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/9] bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function thinker.li
2023-10-17 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/9] bpf: add struct_ops_tab to btf thinker.li
2023-10-19  0:00   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-10-19  0:33     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-10-19  2:28   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-10-19 16:15     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-10-17 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/9] bpf: hold module for bpf_struct_ops_map thinker.li
2023-10-19  0:36   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-10-19 16:29     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-10-20  5:07       ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-10-20 21:37         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-10-20 22:28           ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-10-17 16:23 ` thinker.li [this message]
2023-10-17 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/9] bpf: pass attached BTF to the bpf_struct_ops subsystem thinker.li
2023-10-17 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/9] bpf, net: switch to dynamic registration thinker.li
2023-10-19  1:49   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-10-20 15:12     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-10-20 17:53       ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-10-17 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/9] libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs thinker.li
2023-10-17 21:49   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-18  2:25     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-10-19  2:43   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-10-19 16:31     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-10-17 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 8/9] bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules thinker.li
2023-10-17 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 9/9] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops() thinker.li
2023-10-17 18:03   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231017162306.176586-5-thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drosen@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.