All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH xfrm-next 5/9] net/mlx5e: Unify esw and normal IPsec status table creation/destruction
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 08:13:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231018051311.GE5392@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231017121357.GC5392@unreal>

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 03:13:57PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:38:51AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:15:13PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > From: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com>
> > > 
> > > Change normal IPsec flow to use the same creation/destruction functions
> > > for status flow table as that of ESW, which first of all refines the
> > > code to have less code duplication.
> > > 
> > > And more importantly, the ESW status table handles IPsec syndrome
> > > checks at steering by HW, which is more efficient than the previous
> > > behaviour we had where it was copied to WQE meta data and checked
> > > by the driver.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > 
> > This one does not apply to the ipsec-next tree.
> 
> You are right, sorry about that. It is based on two net-next series
> and I didn't expect such a fast response. 
> 
> 1. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231002083832.19746-1-leon@kernel.org/ - accepted.
> 2. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231014171908.290428-16-saeed@kernel.org/#t - not accepted yet.
> 
> Do you feel comfortable with the series/xfrm patches? If yes, Saeed can
> resend the series directly to net-next once patch #2 is accepted.

Steffen, second patch was accepted too.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/169759322682.7564.2475141741118387188.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org

This series applies cleanly to net-next now.

Thanks

> 
> Thanks
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-18  5:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-16  9:15 [PATCH xfrm-next 0/9] mlx5 IPsec replay window enhancement and XFRM core statistics Leon Romanovsky
2023-10-16  9:15 ` [PATCH xfrm-next 1/9] xfrm: generalize xdo_dev_state_update_curlft to allow statistics update Leon Romanovsky
2023-10-16  9:15 ` [PATCH xfrm-next 2/9] xfrm: get global statistics from the offloaded device Leon Romanovsky
2023-10-16  9:15 ` [PATCH xfrm-next 3/9] net/mlx5e: Honor user choice of IPsec replay window size Leon Romanovsky
2023-10-16  9:15 ` [PATCH xfrm-next 4/9] net/mlx5e: Ensure that IPsec sequence packet number starts from 1 Leon Romanovsky
2023-10-16  9:15 ` [PATCH xfrm-next 5/9] net/mlx5e: Unify esw and normal IPsec status table creation/destruction Leon Romanovsky
2023-10-17  9:38   ` Steffen Klassert
2023-10-17 12:13     ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-10-18  5:13       ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2023-10-19  8:46       ` Steffen Klassert
2023-10-19 11:01         ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-10-16  9:15 ` [PATCH xfrm-next 6/9] net/mlx5e: Remove exposure of IPsec RX flow steering struct Leon Romanovsky
2023-10-16  9:15 ` [PATCH xfrm-next 7/9] net/mlx5e: Add IPsec and ASO syndromes check in HW Leon Romanovsky
2023-10-16  9:15 ` [PATCH xfrm-next 8/9] net/mlx5e: Connect mlx5 IPsec statistics with XFRM core Leon Romanovsky
2023-10-16  9:15 ` [PATCH xfrm-next 9/9] net/mlx5e: Delete obsolete IPsec code Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231018051311.GE5392@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phaddad@nvidia.com \
    --cc=raeds@nvidia.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.