All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, lukas@wunner.de, petrm@nvidia.com,
	jiri@nvidia.com, mlxsw@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 05/12] PCI: Add device-specific reset for NVIDIA Spectrum devices
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 15:08:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231018200826.GA1371652@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231017074257.3389177-6-idosch@nvidia.com>

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:42:50AM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> The PCIe specification defines two methods to trigger a hot reset across
> a link: Bus reset and link disablement (r6.0.1, sec 7.1, sec 6.6.1). In
> the first method, the Secondary Bus Reset (SBR) bit in the Bridge
> Control Register of the Downstream Port is asserted for at least 1ms
> (r6.0.1, sec 7.5.1.3.13). In the second method, the Link Disable bit in
> the Link Control Register of the Downstream Port is asserted and then
> cleared to disable and enable the link (r6.0.1, sec 7.5.3.7).
> 
> While the two methods are identical from the perspective of the
> Downstream device, they are different as far as the host is concerned.
> In the first method, the Link Training and Status State Machine (LTSSM)
> of the Downstream Port is expected to be in the Hot Reset state as long
> as the SBR bit is asserted. In the second method, the LTSSM of the
> Downstream Port is expected to be in the Disabled state as long as the
> Link Disable bit is asserted.
> 
> This above difference is of importance because the specification
> requires the LTTSM to exit from the Hot Reset state to the Detect state
> within a 2ms timeout (r6.0.1, sec 4.2.7.11).

I don't read 4.2.7.11 quite that way.  Here's the text (from r6.0):

  • Lanes that were directed by a higher Layer to initiate Hot
    Reset:

    ◦ All Lanes in the configured Link transmit TS1 Ordered Sets
      with the Hot Reset bit asserted and the configured Link and
      Lane numbers.

    ◦ If two consecutive TS1 Ordered Sets are received on any
      Lane with the Hot Reset bit asserted and configured Link
      and Lane numbers, then:

      ▪ LinkUp = 0b (False)

      ▪ If no higher Layer is directing the Physical Layer to
        remain in Hot Reset, the next state is Detect

      ▪ Otherwise, all Lanes in the configured Link continue to
	transmit TS1 Ordered Sets with the Hot Reset bit asserted
	and the configured Link and Lane numbers.

    ◦ Otherwise, after a 2 ms timeout next state is Detect.

I assume that SBR being set constitutes a "higher Layer directing the
Physical Layer to remain in Hot Reset," so I would read this as saying
the LTSSM stays in Hot Reset as long as SBR is set.  Then, *after* a
2 ms timeout (not *within* 2 ms), the next state is Detect.

> NVIDIA Spectrum devices cannot guarantee it and a host enforcing
> such a behavior might fail to communicate with the device after
> issuing a Secondary Bus Reset.

I don't quite follow this.  What behavior is the host enforcing here?
I guess you're doing an SBR, and the Spectrum device doesn't respond
as expected afterwards?

It looks like pci_reset_secondary_bus() asserts SBR for at least
2 ms.  Then pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() should wait before
accessing the device, but maybe we don't wait long enough?

I guess this ends up back at d3cold_delay as suggested by Lukas.

> With the link disablement method, the host can leave the link
> disabled for enough time to allow the device to undergo a hot reset
> and reach the Detect state. After enabling the link, the host will
> exit from the Disabled state to Detect state (r6.0.1, sec 4.2.7.9)
> and observe that the device is already in the Detect state.
> 
> The PCI core only implements the first method, which might not work with
> NVIDIA Spectrum devices on certain hosts, as explained above. Therefore,
> implement the link disablement method as a device-specific method for
> NVIDIA Spectrum devices. Specifically, disable the link, wait for 500ms,
> enable the link and then wait for the device to become accessible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/quirks.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> index 23f6bd2184e2..a6e308bb934c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> @@ -4182,6 +4182,31 @@ static int reset_hinic_vf_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool probe)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MELLANOX_SPECTRUM		0xcb84
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MELLANOX_SPECTRUM2	0xcf6c
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MELLANOX_SPECTRUM3	0xcf70
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MELLANOX_SPECTRUM4	0xcf80
> +
> +static int reset_mlx(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool probe)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *bridge = pdev->bus->self;
> +
> +	if (probe)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Disable the link on the Downstream port in order to trigger a hot
> +	 * reset in the Downstream device. Wait for 500ms before enabling the
> +	 * link so that the firmware on the device will have enough time to
> +	 * transition the Upstream port to the Detect state.
> +	 */
> +	pcie_capability_set_word(bridge, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_LD);
> +	msleep(500);
> +	pcie_capability_clear_word(bridge, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_LD);
> +
> +	return pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(bridge, "link toggle");
> +}
> +
>  static const struct pci_dev_reset_methods pci_dev_reset_methods[] = {
>  	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82599_SFP_VF,
>  		 reset_intel_82599_sfp_virtfn },
> @@ -4197,6 +4222,10 @@ static const struct pci_dev_reset_methods pci_dev_reset_methods[] = {
>  		reset_chelsio_generic_dev },
>  	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HINIC_VF,
>  		reset_hinic_vf_dev },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_MELLANOX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_MELLANOX_SPECTRUM, reset_mlx },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_MELLANOX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_MELLANOX_SPECTRUM2, reset_mlx },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_MELLANOX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_MELLANOX_SPECTRUM3, reset_mlx },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_MELLANOX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_MELLANOX_SPECTRUM4, reset_mlx },
>  	{ 0 }
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.40.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-18 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-17  7:42 [RFC PATCH net-next 00/12] mlxsw: Add support for new reset flow Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17  7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 01/12] netdevsim: Block until all devices are released Ido Schimmel
2023-10-19  0:53   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-17  7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 02/12] devlink: Hold a reference on parent device Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17  7:56   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-17  8:11     ` Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17  9:01       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-17  7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 03/12] devlink: Acquire device lock during reload Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17  8:04   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-17  7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 04/12] PCI: Add no PM reset quirk for NVIDIA Spectrum devices Ido Schimmel
2023-10-18 19:40   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-22  8:23     ` Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17  7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 05/12] PCI: Add device-specific reset " Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17 10:00   ` Lukas Wunner
2023-10-18 20:08   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2023-10-25 11:05     ` Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17  7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 06/12] PCI: Add debug print for device ready delay Ido Schimmel
2023-10-18 19:41   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-17  7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 07/12] mlxsw: Extend MRSR pack() function to support new commands Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17  7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 08/12] mlxsw: pci: Rename mlxsw_pci_sw_reset() Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17  7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 09/12] mlxsw: pci: Move software reset code to a separate function Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17  7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 10/12] mlxsw: pci: Add support for new reset flow Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17  7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 11/12] mlxsw: pci: Implement PCI reset handlers Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17  7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 12/12] selftests: mlxsw: Add PCI reset test Ido Schimmel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231018200826.GA1371652@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mlxsw@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.