From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1BC741A98; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 19:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="msUQXOC7" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1697656761; x=1729192761; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=iGPJbyS6joPU8I9o2PYhfnt2iIQTBwStBxb7SO7ASug=; b=msUQXOC7RM75PDDLCMsVjqNYX2dPn+p96kZMnFGHsOibLjqwDClYhmX+ 3V9mW4P/p0gVcdQWNXTLn3e2+wVqxpk9tSDW3uvJnXTalcslVjCZ3WcCr 1Zf70Pna6gRTYNwVx//v2j8kWxvlRfQfPlHa57uGd7EsE0SzAdrH5c69A tcbJmgCdo2GRo2gPOV3r8V9ETw2buflkmi245w3reiW2o+N4bLrPcZDvV E1ib07H9pWuW4i/W/xjgdjbfj7O+RXJdbwjOqJ0Y4PGk6GmjBIHCoziCZ AQvb9lO0jZqefR+AVeVUYgwpqiHepboWGGSWadh5OdwYtF7GndZHprbRC Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10867"; a="384966125" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,235,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="384966125" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Oct 2023 12:19:20 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10867"; a="930314505" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,235,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="930314505" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 8917679a5d3e) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2023 12:19:18 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 8917679a5d3e with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qtC4Z-0000tA-2Y; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 19:19:15 +0000 Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 03:18:46 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Andrey Albershteyn , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, fsverity@lists.linux.dev Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, djwong@kernel.org, ebiggers@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, dchinner@redhat.com, Andrey Albershteyn Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 25/28] xfs: add fs-verity support Message-ID: <202310190201.brxlwE23-lkp@intel.com> References: <20231006184922.252188-26-aalbersh@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fsverity@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231006184922.252188-26-aalbersh@redhat.com> Hi Andrey, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on xfs-linux/for-next] [also build test WARNING on kdave/for-next tytso-ext4/dev jaegeuk-f2fs/dev-test jaegeuk-f2fs/dev linus/master v6.6-rc6 next-20231018] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andrey-Albershteyn/xfs-Add-new-name-to-attri-d/20231007-025742 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006184922.252188-26-aalbersh%40redhat.com patch subject: [PATCH v3 25/28] xfs: add fs-verity support config: i386-randconfig-063-20231018 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231019/202310190201.brxlwE23-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231019/202310190201.brxlwE23-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310190201.brxlwE23-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> fs/xfs/xfs_verity.c:165:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'xfs_read_merkle_tree_block' was not declared. Should it be static? -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki