From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
"Michael Tokarev" <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, "Fan Ni" <fan.ni@samsung.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] hw/cxl: Use switch statements for read and write of cachemem registers
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:09:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231019100547.00003eef@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231018173142.00003739@Huawei.com>
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:31:42 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:22:39 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:40:45 -0400
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 03:05:12PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > > Establishing that only register accesses of size 4 and 8 can occur
> > > > using these functions requires looking at their callers. Make it
> > > > easier to see that by using switch statements.
> > > > Assertions are used to enforce that the register storage is of the
> > > > matching size, allowing fixed values to be used for divisors of
> > > > the array indices.
> > > >
> > > > Suggested-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
> > >
> > > Fails with clang:
> > >
> > > ../hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c:130:9: error: expected expression
> > > QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask) != 4);
> > > ^
> > > ../include/qemu/compiler.h:76:30: note: expanded from macro 'QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON'
> > > #define QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(x) QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(x, "not expecting: " #x)
> > > ^
> > > ../include/qemu/compiler.h:74:36: note: expanded from macro 'QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG'
> > > #define QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(x, msg) _Static_assert(!(x), msg)
> > > ^
> > > 1 error generated.
> > >
> > > See e.g.
> > >
> > > https://gitlab.com/mstredhat/qemu/-/jobs/5320879531
> >
> > Thanks. Will see if I can figure out what is going wrong.
> > This code seems cursed. I need to figure out a way to run the CI again.
> > Ran into credit problems I couldn't solve last time I tried.
> >
> > In meantime I can replicate this locally but not immediately obvious to me
> > why it is failing.
>
> Any clang experts around? This seems to be fixed by reducing the scope
>
> case 4:
> {
> QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON();
> }
> I have no idea why though...
>
For anyone following along I asked a friendly compiler guy...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/69572
Given that we realistically need to work around this whatever the outcome
I'll add some brackets and send an update.
thanks,
Jonathan
>
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > v4: Use QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON() instead of static_assert with missing
> > > > error message.
> > > >
> > > > hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > > > index f3bbf0fd13..d1997a52e6 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > > > @@ -67,16 +67,24 @@ static uint64_t cxl_cache_mem_read_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
> > > > CXLComponentState *cxl_cstate = opaque;
> > > > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb;
> > > >
> > > > - if (size == 8) {
> > > > + switch (size) {
> > > > + case 4:
> > > > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) {
> > > > + return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, 4);
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) != 4);
> > > > + return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4];
> > > > + }
> > > > + case 8:
> > > > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> > > > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n");
> > > > return 0;
> > > > - }
> > > > -
> > > > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) {
> > > > - return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, size);
> > > > - } else {
> > > > - return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)];
> > > > + default:
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this
> > > > + * routine is not called with other sizes.
> > > > + */
> > > > + g_assert_not_reached();
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -117,25 +125,36 @@ static void cxl_cache_mem_write_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value,
> > > > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb;
> > > > uint32_t mask;
> > > >
> > > > - if (size == 8) {
> > > > + switch (size) {
> > > > + case 4:
> > > > + QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask) != 4);
> > > > + QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) != 4);
> > > > + mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / 4];
> > > > + value &= mask;
> > > > + /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */
> > > > + value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4];
> > > > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) {
> > > > + cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size);
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY &&
> > > > + offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) {
> > > > + dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value);
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4] = value;
> > > > + }
> > > > + return;
> > > > + case 8:
> > > > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> > > > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n");
> > > > return;
> > > > - }
> > > > - mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask)];
> > > > - value &= mask;
> > > > - /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */
> > > > - value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)];
> > > > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) {
> > > > - cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size);
> > > > - return;
> > > > - }
> > > > -
> > > > - if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY &&
> > > > - offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) {
> > > > - dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value);
> > > > - } else {
> > > > - cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)] = value;
> > > > + default:
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this
> > > > + * routine is not called with other sizes.
> > > > + */
> > > > + g_assert_not_reached();
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.39.2
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
"Michael Tokarev" <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, "Fan Ni" <fan.ni@samsung.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] hw/cxl: Use switch statements for read and write of cachemem registers
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:09:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231019100547.00003eef@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231018173142.00003739@Huawei.com>
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:31:42 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:22:39 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:40:45 -0400
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 03:05:12PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > > Establishing that only register accesses of size 4 and 8 can occur
> > > > using these functions requires looking at their callers. Make it
> > > > easier to see that by using switch statements.
> > > > Assertions are used to enforce that the register storage is of the
> > > > matching size, allowing fixed values to be used for divisors of
> > > > the array indices.
> > > >
> > > > Suggested-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
> > >
> > > Fails with clang:
> > >
> > > ../hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c:130:9: error: expected expression
> > > QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask) != 4);
> > > ^
> > > ../include/qemu/compiler.h:76:30: note: expanded from macro 'QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON'
> > > #define QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(x) QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(x, "not expecting: " #x)
> > > ^
> > > ../include/qemu/compiler.h:74:36: note: expanded from macro 'QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG'
> > > #define QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(x, msg) _Static_assert(!(x), msg)
> > > ^
> > > 1 error generated.
> > >
> > > See e.g.
> > >
> > > https://gitlab.com/mstredhat/qemu/-/jobs/5320879531
> >
> > Thanks. Will see if I can figure out what is going wrong.
> > This code seems cursed. I need to figure out a way to run the CI again.
> > Ran into credit problems I couldn't solve last time I tried.
> >
> > In meantime I can replicate this locally but not immediately obvious to me
> > why it is failing.
>
> Any clang experts around? This seems to be fixed by reducing the scope
>
> case 4:
> {
> QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON();
> }
> I have no idea why though...
>
For anyone following along I asked a friendly compiler guy...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/69572
Given that we realistically need to work around this whatever the outcome
I'll add some brackets and send an update.
thanks,
Jonathan
>
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > v4: Use QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON() instead of static_assert with missing
> > > > error message.
> > > >
> > > > hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > > > index f3bbf0fd13..d1997a52e6 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > > > @@ -67,16 +67,24 @@ static uint64_t cxl_cache_mem_read_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
> > > > CXLComponentState *cxl_cstate = opaque;
> > > > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb;
> > > >
> > > > - if (size == 8) {
> > > > + switch (size) {
> > > > + case 4:
> > > > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) {
> > > > + return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, 4);
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) != 4);
> > > > + return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4];
> > > > + }
> > > > + case 8:
> > > > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> > > > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n");
> > > > return 0;
> > > > - }
> > > > -
> > > > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) {
> > > > - return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, size);
> > > > - } else {
> > > > - return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)];
> > > > + default:
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this
> > > > + * routine is not called with other sizes.
> > > > + */
> > > > + g_assert_not_reached();
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -117,25 +125,36 @@ static void cxl_cache_mem_write_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value,
> > > > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb;
> > > > uint32_t mask;
> > > >
> > > > - if (size == 8) {
> > > > + switch (size) {
> > > > + case 4:
> > > > + QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask) != 4);
> > > > + QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) != 4);
> > > > + mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / 4];
> > > > + value &= mask;
> > > > + /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */
> > > > + value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4];
> > > > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) {
> > > > + cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size);
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY &&
> > > > + offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) {
> > > > + dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value);
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4] = value;
> > > > + }
> > > > + return;
> > > > + case 8:
> > > > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> > > > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n");
> > > > return;
> > > > - }
> > > > - mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask)];
> > > > - value &= mask;
> > > > - /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */
> > > > - value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)];
> > > > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) {
> > > > - cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size);
> > > > - return;
> > > > - }
> > > > -
> > > > - if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY &&
> > > > - offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) {
> > > > - dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value);
> > > > - } else {
> > > > - cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)] = value;
> > > > + default:
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this
> > > > + * routine is not called with other sizes.
> > > > + */
> > > > + g_assert_not_reached();
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.39.2
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-19 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-12 14:05 [PATCH v4 0/4] hw/cxl: Line length reduction and related Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-12 14:05 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-12 14:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] hw/cxl: Use a switch to explicitly check size in caps_reg_read() Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-12 14:05 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-12 14:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] hw/cxl: Use switch statements for read and write of cachemem registers Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-12 14:05 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-18 14:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-18 16:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-18 16:22 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-18 16:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-18 16:31 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-19 9:09 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-10-19 9:09 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-19 9:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-19 11:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-19 11:24 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-19 11:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-19 11:48 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-12 14:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] hw/cxl: CXLDVSECPortExtensions renamed to CXLDVSECPortExt Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-12 14:05 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-12 14:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] hw/cxl: Line length reductions Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-12 14:05 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-13 16:56 ` fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231019100547.00003eef@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=fan.ni@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.