All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	Icenowy Zheng <uwu@icenowy.me>,
	Maksim Kiselev <bigunclemax@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Allwinner R528/T113s PSCI
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 01:53:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231022015325.28db2090@slackpad.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231012014756.2573473-1-CFSworks@gmail.com>

On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 19:47:52 -0600
Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Sam,

> Hi list,
> 
> This is the third, and hopefully final, version of my patchset for PSCI support
> on R528/T113-s3. This one, as always, depends on Andre Przywara's T113s support
> series (v2), available on the list and also located on a Git branch at:
> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-sunxi.git t113s-v2
> 
> NOTE THAT THIS ALSO depends on the following commit on master:
> 3d5e52bd97 ("ARM: psci: move GIC address override to Kconfig")
> 
> For testing: I can confirm that patch 2/4 results in no change to machine code
> whatsoever on any supported target. Patch 1/4 results in a minor machine code
> change on R40 only. Patch 3/4 will likely require testing on each of the 4
> "special case" sunxi targets (sun6i, sun7i, R40, H3) to ensure that register
> offsets are kept consistent. Patch 4/4 needs testing on R528 only.

For now I have included this series into the T113s support series and
pushed this to sunxi/master, to trigger the CI.

I will do some final testing here on the MangoPi and other boards (for
regressions), but I am hopeful to send a pull request in the next day
to two.

Thanks again for your persistent work on this, much appreciated!

Cheers,
Andre

 > 
> Warm regards,
> Sam
> 
> Changes v3->v4:
> - The GIC base address override is done through Kconfig, instead of in
>   sunxi-common.h
> 
> Changes v2->v3:
> - Fix missing `cpu=0;` for the sun7i power management case.
> - Make sunxi_cpu_power_off() a static function, per feedback on v2.
> - Kevin Amadiva of MEC electronics got in touch with me off-list,
> reported success bringing up CPU1 of a T113 with this patchset, and
> kindly provided me with a Tested-by tag for patch 4/4.
> - Remove a comment about R40/R528 being special, per feedback on v2.
> - Simplify an if statement, per feedback on v2.
> - Add missing 'select' directives to the R528 Kconfig, per feedback
> on v2.
> 
> Changes v1->v2:
> - Power clamp is now adjusted ONLY on sun{6,7}i, H3, R40. The
> previous version was mistakenly doing this EXCEPT on those machines.
> - Flattened sunxi_power_switch() into sunxi_cpu_set_power() for
> simplicity's sake.
> - Moved the "power clamp is not NULL" conditional into
> sunxi_cpu_set_power().
> - Removed unnecessary H6 special-case, since H6 is actually ARM64.
> - Renamed SUNXI_CPUX_BASE to SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE, to mirror expected
> changes in Andre's v2 of the R528 series (we decided against using a
> new name for this block).
> - Removed sunxi_cpucfg_reg struct, and stopped using the PRCM struct
> in psci.c.
> 
> Sam Edwards (4):
>   sunxi: psci: clean away preprocessor macros
>   sunxi: psci: refactor register access to separate functions
>   sunxi: psci: stop modeling register layout with C structs
>   sunxi: psci: implement PSCI on R528
> 
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Kconfig               |   3 +-
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c          | 185
> ++++++++++++++--------- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpucfg.h |
> 67 -------- arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig              |   4 +
>  4 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpucfg.h
> 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-22  0:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-12  1:47 [PATCH v4 0/4] Allwinner R528/T113s PSCI Sam Edwards
2023-10-12  1:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] sunxi: psci: clean away preprocessor macros Sam Edwards
2023-10-12  1:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] sunxi: psci: refactor register access to separate functions Sam Edwards
2023-10-12  1:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] sunxi: psci: stop modeling register layout with C structs Sam Edwards
2023-10-22  0:48   ` Andre Przywara
2023-10-12  1:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] sunxi: psci: implement PSCI on R528 Sam Edwards
2023-10-22  0:49   ` Andre Przywara
2023-10-24 22:16     ` Andre Przywara
2023-10-22  0:53 ` Andre Przywara [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231022015325.28db2090@slackpad.lan \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=bigunclemax@gmail.com \
    --cc=cfsworks@gmail.com \
    --cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=samuel@sholland.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    --cc=uwu@icenowy.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.