From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] x86/stackprotector/32: Remove stack protector test script
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 17:17:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231023211730.40566-2-brgerst@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231023211730.40566-1-brgerst@gmail.com>
Test for compiler support directly in Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh | 8 --------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
delete mode 100755 scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 5ef081aa12ac..039872be1630 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ config PGTABLE_LEVELS
config CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR
bool
default $(success,$(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS)) if 64BIT
- default $(success,$(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS))
+ default $(cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard-reg=fs -mstack-protector-guard-symbol=__stack_chk_guard)
help
We have to make sure stack protector is unconditionally disabled if
the compiler produces broken code or if it does not let us control
diff --git a/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh b/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh
deleted file mode 100755
index 825c75c5b715..000000000000
--- a/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-
-# This requires GCC 8.1 or better. Specifically, we require
-# -mstack-protector-guard-reg, added by
-# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81708
-
-echo "int foo(void) { char X[200]; return 3; }" | $* -S -x c -c -m32 -O0 -fstack-protector -mstack-protector-guard-reg=fs -mstack-protector-guard-symbol=__stack_chk_guard - -o - 2> /dev/null | grep -q "%fs"
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-23 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-23 21:17 [PATCH 0/9] x86-64: Stack protector and percpu improvements Brian Gerst
2023-10-23 21:17 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2023-10-23 21:17 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/boot: Disable stack protector for early boot code Brian Gerst
2023-10-23 21:17 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/stackprotector/64: Convert stack protector to normal percpu variable Brian Gerst
2023-10-24 12:39 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-10-23 21:17 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/percpu/64: Remove fixed_percpu_data Brian Gerst
2023-10-24 12:33 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-10-24 14:11 ` Brian Gerst
2023-10-23 21:17 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/percpu/64: Use relative percpu offsets Brian Gerst
2023-10-24 12:43 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-10-23 21:17 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/boot/64: Remove inverse relocations Brian Gerst
2023-10-23 21:17 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/percpu/64: Remove INIT_PER_CPU macros Brian Gerst
2023-10-23 21:17 ` [PATCH 8/9] percpu: Remove PER_CPU_FIRST_SECTION Brian Gerst
2023-10-23 21:17 ` [PATCH 9/9] kallsyms: Remove KALLSYMS_ABSOLUTE_PERCPU Brian Gerst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231023211730.40566-2-brgerst@gmail.com \
--to=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.