From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84021C123 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 08:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="KVik5345" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1698308473; x=1729844473; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=+MMaJD/uFuZDtjo4XI6Y72JQRGgvkRpHzO6wXyOGNlk=; b=KVik5345GD/CdJUNqSIB856Ix6wNoz4gmycj6lffPEEtbxGmneoxMPxl LBImVQ7HcXAPwVOdm5yAYUKKY2HW2dk5+q0GvxIwk+05ZmgxiPsv8szYj e3nZylKKFTGhwzCTbwTwZF9SaxJiL749KEDT+769S+dQnqSmOEWh5kBYd wvu1y1BTx1dwj7qbSi/O7E5rFaGOKjM1T6rp/nHPaL3uehhuySnMafwzd EiVsFJTgzGrorKRQNO0FGffsQpZgAo8Wk2JV6sCl+rH/o0vwENiiAclqA TuRAXsCsZgKPUQ265nvzCedMIG3oLVbx5LT403ap0DD3Y/OkG6TfA0U35 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10874"; a="367698238" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,253,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="367698238" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2023 01:21:12 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,253,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="373205" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 8917679a5d3e) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Oct 2023 01:20:37 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 8917679a5d3e with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qvvc5-0009d1-12; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 08:21:09 +0000 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:20:49 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC] firmware: arm_scmi: support clock denied attributes Message-ID: <202310261600.BinnN8W6-lkp@intel.com> References: <20231026034125.1823954-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231026034125.1823954-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> Hi Peng, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on soc/for-next] [also build test WARNING on next-20231025] [cannot apply to clk/clk-next linus/master v6.6-rc7] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Peng-Fan-OSS/firmware-arm_scmi-support-clock-denied-attributes/20231026-113745 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026034125.1823954-1-peng.fan%40oss.nxp.com patch subject: [RFC] firmware: arm_scmi: support clock denied attributes config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231026/202310261600.BinnN8W6-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231026/202310261600.BinnN8W6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310261600.BinnN8W6-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c: In function 'scmi_clk_set_rate': >> drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c:79:13: warning: unused variable 'rate1' [-Wunused-variable] 79 | u64 rate1 = 0; | ^~~~~ vim +/rate1 +79 drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c 73 74 static int scmi_clk_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, 75 unsigned long parent_rate) 76 { 77 struct scmi_clk *clk = to_scmi_clk(hw); 78 const struct scmi_clock_info *info = clk->info; > 79 u64 rate1 = 0; 80 81 if (info->flags & SCMI_CLOCK_SET_RATE_DENIED) 82 return -EACCES; 83 84 return scmi_proto_clk_ops->rate_set(clk->ph, clk->id, rate); 85 } 86 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki