All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thinker.li@gmail.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
	drosen@google.com
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
	Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/10] bpf: pass attached BTF to the bpf_struct_ops subsystem
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:52:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231027205227.855463-7-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231027205227.855463-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>

From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>

Giving a BTF, the bpf_struct_ops knows the right place to look up type info
associated with a type ID. This enables a user space program to load a
struct_ops object linked to a struct_ops type defined by a module, by
providing the module BTF (fd).

The bpf_prog includes attach_btf in aux which is passed along with the
bpf_attr when loading the program. The purpose of attach_btf is to
determine the btf type of attach_btf_id. The attach_btf_id is then used to
identify the traced function for a trace program. In the case of struct_ops
programs, it is used to identify the struct_ops type of the struct_ops
object that a program is attached to.

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h   |  1 +
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  5 +++++
 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c    | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |  2 +-
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c          | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  5 +++++
 6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 24213a99cc79..c1461342f19e 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -598,6 +598,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_env {
 	u32 prev_insn_idx;
 	struct bpf_prog *prog;		/* eBPF program being verified */
 	const struct bpf_verifier_ops *ops;
+	struct module *attach_btf_mod;	/* The owner module of prog->aux->attach_btf */
 	struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *head; /* stack of verifier states to be processed */
 	int stack_size;			/* number of states to be processed */
 	bool strict_alignment;		/* perform strict pointer alignment checks */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 0f6cdf52b1da..fd20c52606b2 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1398,6 +1398,11 @@ union bpf_attr {
 		 * to using 5 hash functions).
 		 */
 		__u64	map_extra;
+
+		__u32   value_type_btf_obj_fd;	/* fd pointing to a BTF
+						 * type data for
+						 * btf_vmlinux_value_type_id.
+						 */
 	};
 
 	struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_MAP_*_ELEM commands */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index 256516aba632..db2bbba50e38 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -694,6 +694,7 @@ static void __bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 		bpf_jit_uncharge_modmem(PAGE_SIZE);
 	}
 	bpf_map_area_free(st_map->uvalue);
+	btf_put(st_map->st_ops_desc->btf);
 	bpf_map_area_free(st_map);
 }
 
@@ -735,16 +736,31 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	const struct btf_type *t, *vt;
 	struct module *mod = NULL;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
+	struct btf *btf;
 	int ret;
 
-	st_ops_desc = bpf_struct_ops_find_value(btf_vmlinux, attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id);
-	if (!st_ops_desc)
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
+	if (attr->value_type_btf_obj_fd) {
+		/* The map holds btf for its whole life time. */
+		btf = btf_get_by_fd(attr->value_type_btf_obj_fd);
+		if (IS_ERR(btf))
+			return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(btf));
+
+		if (btf != btf_vmlinux) {
+			mod = btf_try_get_module(btf);
+			if (!mod) {
+				ret = -EINVAL;
+				goto errout;
+			}
+		}
+	} else {
+		btf = btf_vmlinux;
+		btf_get(btf);
+	}
 
-	if (st_ops_desc->btf != btf_vmlinux) {
-		mod = btf_try_get_module(st_ops_desc->btf);
-		if (!mod)
-			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	st_ops_desc = bpf_struct_ops_find_value(btf, attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id);
+	if (!st_ops_desc) {
+		ret = -ENOTSUPP;
+		goto errout;
 	}
 
 	vt = st_ops_desc->value_type;
@@ -805,7 +821,9 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	__bpf_struct_ops_map_free(map);
 	btf = NULL;		/* has been released */
 errout:
+	btf_put(btf);
 	module_put(mod);
+
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 0ed286b8a0f0..974651fe2bee 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ static int map_check_btf(struct bpf_map *map, const struct btf *btf,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-#define BPF_MAP_CREATE_LAST_FIELD map_extra
+#define BPF_MAP_CREATE_LAST_FIELD value_type_btf_obj_fd
 /* called via syscall */
 static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index bdd166cab977..d03b39fb0faa 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -20086,6 +20086,7 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	const struct btf_member *member;
 	struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
 	u32 btf_id, member_idx;
+	struct btf *btf;
 	const char *mname;
 
 	if (!prog->gpl_compatible) {
@@ -20093,8 +20094,18 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	btf = prog->aux->attach_btf;
+	if (btf != btf_vmlinux) {
+		/* Make sure st_ops is valid through the lifetime of env */
+		env->attach_btf_mod = btf_try_get_module(btf);
+		if (!env->attach_btf_mod) {
+			verbose(env, "owner module of btf is not found\n");
+			return -ENOTSUPP;
+		}
+	}
+
 	btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
-	st_ops_desc = bpf_struct_ops_find(btf_vmlinux, btf_id);
+	st_ops_desc = bpf_struct_ops_find(btf, btf_id);
 	if (!st_ops_desc) {
 		verbose(env, "attach_btf_id %u is not a supported struct\n",
 			btf_id);
@@ -20805,6 +20816,8 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, __u3
 		env->prog->expected_attach_type = 0;
 
 	*prog = env->prog;
+
+	module_put(env->attach_btf_mod);
 err_unlock:
 	if (!is_priv)
 		mutex_unlock(&bpf_verifier_lock);
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 0f6cdf52b1da..fd20c52606b2 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1398,6 +1398,11 @@ union bpf_attr {
 		 * to using 5 hash functions).
 		 */
 		__u64	map_extra;
+
+		__u32   value_type_btf_obj_fd;	/* fd pointing to a BTF
+						 * type data for
+						 * btf_vmlinux_value_type_id.
+						 */
 	};
 
 	struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_MAP_*_ELEM commands */
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-27 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-27 20:52 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/10] Registrating struct_ops types from modules thinker.li
2023-10-27 20:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/10] bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function thinker.li
2023-10-27 20:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/10] bpf, net: introduce bpf_struct_ops_desc thinker.li
2023-10-27 20:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/10] bpf: add struct_ops_tab to btf thinker.li
2023-10-27 20:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/10] bpf: hold module for bpf_struct_ops_map thinker.li
2023-10-27 20:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/10] bpf: validate value_type thinker.li
2023-10-27 20:52 ` thinker.li [this message]
2023-10-27 20:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/10] bpf, net: switch to dynamic registration thinker.li
2023-10-27 20:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/10] libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs thinker.li
2023-10-27 20:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/10] bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules thinker.li
2023-10-27 20:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/10] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops() thinker.li
2023-10-27 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/10] Registrating struct_ops types from modules Kui-Feng Lee
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-27 21:16 thinker.li
2023-10-27 21:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/10] bpf: pass attached BTF to the bpf_struct_ops subsystem thinker.li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231027205227.855463-7-thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drosen@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.