From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: alexandru.matei@uipath.com, kuba@kernel.org, sgarzare@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] vsock/virtio: initialize the_virtio_vsock before using VQs" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:09:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023102739-channel-upstream-7bca@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 53b08c4985158430fd6d035fb49443bada535210
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023102739-channel-upstream-7bca@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 53b08c4985158430fd6d035fb49443bada535210 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexandru Matei <alexandru.matei@uipath.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 22:17:42 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] vsock/virtio: initialize the_virtio_vsock before using VQs
Once VQs are filled with empty buffers and we kick the host, it can send
connection requests. If the_virtio_vsock is not initialized before,
replies are silently dropped and do not reach the host.
virtio_transport_send_pkt() can queue packets once the_virtio_vsock is
set, but they won't be processed until vsock->tx_run is set to true. We
queue vsock->send_pkt_work when initialization finishes to send those
packets queued earlier.
Fixes: 0deab087b16a ("vsock/virtio: use RCU to avoid use-after-free on the_virtio_vsock")
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Matei <alexandru.matei@uipath.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024191742.14259-1-alexandru.matei@uipath.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
index e95df847176b..b80bf681327b 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
@@ -555,6 +555,11 @@ static int virtio_vsock_vqs_init(struct virtio_vsock *vsock)
virtio_device_ready(vdev);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void virtio_vsock_vqs_start(struct virtio_vsock *vsock)
+{
mutex_lock(&vsock->tx_lock);
vsock->tx_run = true;
mutex_unlock(&vsock->tx_lock);
@@ -569,7 +574,16 @@ static int virtio_vsock_vqs_init(struct virtio_vsock *vsock)
vsock->event_run = true;
mutex_unlock(&vsock->event_lock);
- return 0;
+ /* virtio_transport_send_pkt() can queue packets once
+ * the_virtio_vsock is set, but they won't be processed until
+ * vsock->tx_run is set to true. We queue vsock->send_pkt_work
+ * when initialization finishes to send those packets queued
+ * earlier.
+ * We don't need to queue the other workers (rx, event) because
+ * as long as we don't fill the queues with empty buffers, the
+ * host can't send us any notification.
+ */
+ queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->send_pkt_work);
}
static void virtio_vsock_vqs_del(struct virtio_vsock *vsock)
@@ -664,6 +678,7 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
goto out;
rcu_assign_pointer(the_virtio_vsock, vsock);
+ virtio_vsock_vqs_start(vsock);
mutex_unlock(&the_virtio_vsock_mutex);
@@ -736,6 +751,7 @@ static int virtio_vsock_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
goto out;
rcu_assign_pointer(the_virtio_vsock, vsock);
+ virtio_vsock_vqs_start(vsock);
out:
mutex_unlock(&the_virtio_vsock_mutex);
reply other threads:[~2023-10-27 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023102739-channel-upstream-7bca@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexandru.matei@uipath.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.