From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08EFCA20 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2023 04:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Iq3oapHf" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1698554811; x=1730090811; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=jMpH37zkAI7I7IOsyH3/B+LachWNUrWL0/QvxxtrhT8=; b=Iq3oapHfK4SoQ4RYnlURgLl1b4ukGpS7HsfJ2DvR4mgdLw1GARUUU0iY KvainWrqZ+xVNAn07ZFNJU47lBJc/TctukQddcdQBtQzYH6MGLJaKibBR g4+IDZVG61+D9SWddWE2jkrFXnmip8440q2sEV0+8hrHDsbrFFQGqai0H 3/WA8aJIpnbJChY63RbQAK7RcG0ajphOc9nE2YIliNUegrcsqzhVH6adt zToFPOV0gZNAU8hbkUc5rCYsYBicQmloqX1wJE9XjEp9AvkDgugFIwV/c l3P/Wjc9iH4aZLkXQsuXvoXKhcS7SuUdlBuJwdJUH2uzj/J40XbQtr9Li A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10877"; a="385135689" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,260,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="385135689" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Oct 2023 21:46:50 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10877"; a="709785523" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,260,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="709785523" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 8917679a5d3e) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2023 21:46:48 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 8917679a5d3e with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qwxhG-000CKU-1z; Sun, 29 Oct 2023 04:46:46 +0000 Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 12:46:34 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Daniel Gomez Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/11] shmem: add per-block uptodate tracking Message-ID: <202310291218.fYLv1WWN-lkp@intel.com> References: <20231028211518.3424020-12-da.gomez@samsung.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231028211518.3424020-12-da.gomez@samsung.com> Hi Daniel, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything] [also build test ERROR on next-20231027] [cannot apply to linus/master v6.6-rc7] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Daniel-Gomez/XArray-add-cmpxchg-order-test/20231029-051730 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231028211518.3424020-12-da.gomez%40samsung.com patch subject: [RFC PATCH 11/11] shmem: add per-block uptodate tracking config: powerpc64-randconfig-003-20231029 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231029/202310291218.fYLv1WWN-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231029/202310291218.fYLv1WWN-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310291218.fYLv1WWN-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> mm/shmem.c:4673:29: error: 'shmem_invalidate_folio' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'shmem_replace_folio'? 4673 | .invalidate_folio = shmem_invalidate_folio, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | shmem_replace_folio >> mm/shmem.c:4674:27: error: 'shmem_release_folio' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'shmem_replace_folio'? 4674 | .release_folio = shmem_release_folio, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | shmem_replace_folio >> mm/shmem.c:4675:34: error: 'shmem_is_partially_uptodate' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'shmem_set_range_uptodate'? 4675 | .is_partially_uptodate = shmem_is_partially_uptodate, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | shmem_set_range_uptodate >> mm/shmem.c:212:13: warning: 'sfs_free' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 212 | static void sfs_free(struct folio *folio) | ^~~~~~~~ vim +4673 mm/shmem.c 4662 4663 const struct address_space_operations shmem_aops = { 4664 .writepage = shmem_writepage, 4665 .dirty_folio = noop_dirty_folio, 4666 #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS 4667 .write_begin = shmem_write_begin, 4668 .write_end = shmem_write_end, 4669 #endif 4670 #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION 4671 .migrate_folio = migrate_folio, 4672 #endif > 4673 .invalidate_folio = shmem_invalidate_folio, > 4674 .release_folio = shmem_release_folio, > 4675 .is_partially_uptodate = shmem_is_partially_uptodate, 4676 .error_remove_page = shmem_error_remove_page, 4677 }; 4678 EXPORT_SYMBOL(shmem_aops); 4679 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki