From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
"Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
"Nico Böhr" <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>,
Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 05/10] s390x: topology: Make some report messages unique
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 17:03:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231030160349.458764-6-nsg@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231030160349.458764-1-nsg@linux.ibm.com>
When we test something, i.e. do a report() we want unique messages,
otherwise, from the test output, it will appear as if the same test was
run multiple times, possible with different PASS/FAIL values.
Convert some reports that don't actually test anything topology specific
into asserts.
Refine the report message for others.
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/topology.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/s390x/topology.c b/s390x/topology.c
index c8ad4bcb..03bc3d3b 100644
--- a/s390x/topology.c
+++ b/s390x/topology.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void check_polarization_change(void)
report_prefix_push("Polarization change");
/* We expect a clean state through reset */
- report(diag308_load_reset(1), "load normal reset done");
+ assert(diag308_load_reset(1));
/*
* Set vertical polarization to verify that RESET sets
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static void check_polarization_change(void)
cc = ptf(PTF_REQ_VERTICAL, &rc);
report(cc == 0, "Set vertical polarization.");
- report(diag308_load_reset(1), "load normal reset done");
+ assert(diag308_load_reset(1));
cc = ptf(PTF_CHECK, &rc);
report(cc == 0, "Reset should clear topology report");
@@ -137,25 +137,25 @@ static void check_polarization_change(void)
report(cc == 0, "Change to vertical");
cc = ptf(PTF_CHECK, &rc);
- report(cc == 1, "Should report");
+ report(cc == 1, "Should report change after horizontal -> vertical");
cc = ptf(PTF_REQ_VERTICAL, &rc);
report(cc == 2 && rc == PTF_ERR_ALRDY_POLARIZED, "Double change to vertical");
cc = ptf(PTF_CHECK, &rc);
- report(cc == 0, "Should not report");
+ report(cc == 0, "Should not report change after vertical -> vertical");
cc = ptf(PTF_REQ_HORIZONTAL, &rc);
report(cc == 0, "Change to horizontal");
cc = ptf(PTF_CHECK, &rc);
- report(cc == 1, "Should Report");
+ report(cc == 1, "Should report change after vertical -> horizontal");
cc = ptf(PTF_REQ_HORIZONTAL, &rc);
report(cc == 2 && rc == PTF_ERR_ALRDY_POLARIZED, "Double change to horizontal");
cc = ptf(PTF_CHECK, &rc);
- report(cc == 0, "Should not report");
+ report(cc == 0, "Should not report change after horizontal -> horizontal");
report_prefix_pop();
}
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-30 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-30 16:03 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/10] s390x: topology: Fixes and extension Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-10-30 16:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 01/10] s390x: topology: Introduce enums for polarization & cpu type Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-10-30 16:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 02/10] s390x: topology: Fix report message Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-10-30 16:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/10] s390x: topology: Use function parameter in stsi_get_sysib Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-10-30 16:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 04/10] s390x: topology: Fix parsing loop Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-10-30 16:03 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2023-10-30 16:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/10] s390x: topology: Refine stsi header test Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-10-30 16:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 07/10] s390x: topology: Rename topology_core to topology_cpu Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-10-30 16:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 08/10] s390x: topology: Rewrite topology list test Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-10-30 16:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 09/10] scripts: Implement multiline strings for extra_params Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-10-30 16:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 10/10] s390x: topology: Add complex topology test Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-11-07 9:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/10] s390x: topology: Fixes and extension Nico Boehr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231030160349.458764-6-nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikos.nikoleris@arm.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.