From: Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>,
Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>,
Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] accel/ivpu: Fix locking in ivpu_bo_remove_all_bos_from_context()
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 08:31:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231031073156.1301669-3-stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231031073156.1301669-1-stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>
From: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>
ivpu_bo_remove_all_bos_from_context() could race with ivpu_bo_free()
when prime buffer was closed after vpu device was closed.
Move the bo_list from context to vdev and use a dedicated lock to
sync it. This list is not modified when BO is added/removed from
a context.
Also rename ivpu_bo_free_vpu_addr() to ivpu_bo_unbind() because this
function does more then just free vpu_addr.
Signed-off-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_drv.c | 7 +-
drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_drv.h | 3 +
drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c | 131 +++++++++++++-------------
drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.h | 6 +-
drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu.c | 5 +-
drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.c | 36 ++++---
drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.h | 11 +--
7 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_drv.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_drv.c
index 60277ff6af69..cc6a4dca2aaa 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_drv.c
@@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ static void file_priv_release(struct kref *ref)
ivpu_dbg(vdev, FILE, "file_priv release: ctx %u\n", file_priv->ctx.id);
ivpu_cmdq_release_all(file_priv);
- ivpu_bo_remove_all_bos_from_context(&file_priv->ctx);
ivpu_jsm_context_release(vdev, file_priv->ctx.id);
+ ivpu_bo_remove_all_bos_from_context(vdev, &file_priv->ctx);
ivpu_mmu_user_context_fini(vdev, &file_priv->ctx);
drm_WARN_ON(&vdev->drm, xa_erase_irq(&vdev->context_xa, file_priv->ctx.id) != file_priv);
mutex_destroy(&file_priv->lock);
@@ -528,6 +528,11 @@ static int ivpu_dev_init(struct ivpu_device *vdev)
xa_init_flags(&vdev->context_xa, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
xa_init_flags(&vdev->submitted_jobs_xa, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC1);
lockdep_set_class(&vdev->submitted_jobs_xa.xa_lock, &submitted_jobs_xa_lock_class_key);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->bo_list);
+
+ ret = drmm_mutex_init(&vdev->drm, &vdev->bo_list_lock);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_xa_destroy;
ret = ivpu_pci_init(vdev);
if (ret)
diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_drv.h b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_drv.h
index 79b193ffbc26..e0517ec4133d 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_drv.h
@@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ struct ivpu_device {
struct xarray context_xa;
struct xa_limit context_xa_limit;
+ struct mutex bo_list_lock; /* Protects bo_list */
+ struct list_head bo_list;
+
struct xarray submitted_jobs_xa;
struct task_struct *job_done_thread;
diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c
index d1077cf90b65..915c53d7bb97 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c
@@ -26,6 +26,17 @@ static const struct drm_gem_object_funcs ivpu_gem_funcs;
static struct lock_class_key prime_bo_lock_class_key;
+static inline void ivpu_dbg_bo(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_bo *bo, const char *action)
+{
+ if (bo->ctx)
+ ivpu_dbg(vdev, BO, "%6s: size %zu has_pages %d dma_mapped %d handle %u ctx %d vpu_addr 0x%llx mmu_mapped %d\n",
+ action, bo->base.size, (bool)bo->pages, (bool)bo->sgt, bo->handle,
+ bo->ctx->id, bo->vpu_addr, bo->mmu_mapped);
+ else
+ ivpu_dbg(vdev, BO, "%6s: size %zu has_pages %d dma_mapped %d handle %u (not added to context)\n",
+ action, bo->base.size, (bool)bo->pages, (bool)bo->sgt, bo->handle);
+}
+
static int __must_check prime_alloc_pages_locked(struct ivpu_bo *bo)
{
/* Pages are managed by the underlying dma-buf */
@@ -245,9 +256,8 @@ int __must_check ivpu_bo_pin(struct ivpu_bo *bo)
mutex_lock(&bo->lock);
- if (!bo->vpu_addr) {
- ivpu_err(vdev, "vpu_addr not set for BO ctx_id: %d handle: %d\n",
- bo->ctx->id, bo->handle);
+ if (!bo->ctx) {
+ ivpu_err(vdev, "vpu_addr not allocated for BO %d\n", bo->handle);
ret = -EINVAL;
goto unlock;
}
@@ -281,53 +291,68 @@ ivpu_bo_alloc_vpu_addr(struct ivpu_bo *bo, struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx,
struct ivpu_device *vdev = ivpu_bo_to_vdev(bo);
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&ctx->lock);
- ret = ivpu_mmu_context_insert_node_locked(ctx, range, ivpu_bo_size(bo), &bo->mm_node);
+ mutex_lock(&bo->lock);
+
+ ret = ivpu_mmu_context_insert_node(ctx, range, bo->base.size, &bo->mm_node);
if (!ret) {
bo->ctx = ctx;
bo->vpu_addr = bo->mm_node.start;
- list_add_tail(&bo->ctx_node, &ctx->bo_list);
+ } else {
+ ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to add BO to context %u: %d\n", ctx->id, ret);
}
- mutex_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+ ivpu_dbg_bo(vdev, bo, "alloc");
- if (ret)
- ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to add BO to context %u: %d\n", ctx->id, ret);
+ mutex_unlock(&bo->lock);
return ret;
}
-static void ivpu_bo_free_vpu_addr(struct ivpu_bo *bo)
+static void ivpu_bo_unbind_locked(struct ivpu_bo *bo)
{
struct ivpu_device *vdev = ivpu_bo_to_vdev(bo);
- struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx = bo->ctx;
- ivpu_dbg(vdev, BO, "remove from ctx: ctx %d vpu_addr 0x%llx allocated %d mmu_mapped %d\n",
- ctx->id, bo->vpu_addr, (bool)bo->sgt, bo->mmu_mapped);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&bo->lock);
- mutex_lock(&bo->lock);
+ ivpu_dbg_bo(vdev, bo, "unbind");
+ /* TODO: dma_unmap */
if (bo->mmu_mapped) {
+ drm_WARN_ON(&vdev->drm, !bo->ctx);
+ drm_WARN_ON(&vdev->drm, !bo->vpu_addr);
drm_WARN_ON(&vdev->drm, !bo->sgt);
- ivpu_mmu_context_unmap_sgt(vdev, ctx, bo->vpu_addr, bo->sgt);
+ ivpu_mmu_context_unmap_sgt(vdev, bo->ctx, bo->vpu_addr, bo->sgt);
bo->mmu_mapped = false;
}
- mutex_lock(&ctx->lock);
- list_del(&bo->ctx_node);
- bo->vpu_addr = 0;
- bo->ctx = NULL;
- ivpu_mmu_context_remove_node_locked(ctx, &bo->mm_node);
- mutex_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+ if (bo->ctx) {
+ ivpu_mmu_context_remove_node(bo->ctx, &bo->mm_node);
+ bo->vpu_addr = 0;
+ bo->ctx = NULL;
+ }
+}
+static void ivpu_bo_unbind(struct ivpu_bo *bo)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&bo->lock);
+ ivpu_bo_unbind_locked(bo);
mutex_unlock(&bo->lock);
}
-void ivpu_bo_remove_all_bos_from_context(struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx)
+void ivpu_bo_remove_all_bos_from_context(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx)
{
- struct ivpu_bo *bo, *tmp;
+ struct ivpu_bo *bo;
+
+ if (drm_WARN_ON(&vdev->drm, !ctx))
+ return;
- list_for_each_entry_safe(bo, tmp, &ctx->bo_list, ctx_node)
- ivpu_bo_free_vpu_addr(bo);
+ mutex_lock(&vdev->bo_list_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(bo, &vdev->bo_list, bo_list_node) {
+ mutex_lock(&bo->lock);
+ if (bo->ctx == ctx)
+ ivpu_bo_unbind_locked(bo);
+ mutex_unlock(&bo->lock);
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&vdev->bo_list_lock);
}
static struct ivpu_bo *
@@ -375,6 +400,10 @@ ivpu_bo_alloc(struct ivpu_device *vdev, u64 size, u32 flags, const struct ivpu_b
}
}
+ mutex_lock(&vdev->bo_list_lock);
+ list_add_tail(&bo->bo_list_node, &vdev->bo_list);
+ mutex_unlock(&vdev->bo_list_lock);
+
return bo;
err_release:
@@ -406,19 +435,16 @@ static void ivpu_bo_free(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
struct ivpu_bo *bo = to_ivpu_bo(obj);
struct ivpu_device *vdev = ivpu_bo_to_vdev(bo);
- if (bo->ctx)
- ivpu_dbg(vdev, BO, "free: ctx %d vpu_addr 0x%llx allocated %d mmu_mapped %d\n",
- bo->ctx->id, bo->vpu_addr, (bool)bo->sgt, bo->mmu_mapped);
- else
- ivpu_dbg(vdev, BO, "free: ctx (released) allocated %d mmu_mapped %d\n",
- (bool)bo->sgt, bo->mmu_mapped);
+ mutex_lock(&vdev->bo_list_lock);
+ list_del(&bo->bo_list_node);
+ mutex_unlock(&vdev->bo_list_lock);
drm_WARN_ON(&vdev->drm, !dma_resv_test_signaled(obj->resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ));
- vunmap(bo->kvaddr);
+ ivpu_dbg_bo(vdev, bo, "free");
- if (bo->ctx)
- ivpu_bo_free_vpu_addr(bo);
+ ivpu_bo_unbind(bo);
+ vunmap(bo->kvaddr);
if (bo->sgt)
ivpu_bo_unmap_and_free_pages(bo);
@@ -435,10 +461,6 @@ static void ivpu_bo_free(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
static int ivpu_bo_mmap(struct drm_gem_object *obj, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
struct ivpu_bo *bo = to_ivpu_bo(obj);
- struct ivpu_device *vdev = ivpu_bo_to_vdev(bo);
-
- ivpu_dbg(vdev, BO, "mmap: ctx %u handle %u vpu_addr 0x%llx size %zu type %s",
- bo->ctx->id, bo->handle, bo->vpu_addr, ivpu_bo_size(bo), bo->ops->name);
if (obj->import_attach) {
/* Drop the reference drm_gem_mmap_obj() acquired.*/
@@ -553,9 +575,6 @@ ivpu_bo_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
drm_gem_object_put(&bo->base);
- ivpu_dbg(vdev, BO, "alloc shmem: ctx %u vpu_addr 0x%llx size %zu flags 0x%x\n",
- file_priv->ctx.id, bo->vpu_addr, ivpu_bo_size(bo), bo->flags);
-
return ret;
}
@@ -609,9 +628,6 @@ ivpu_bo_alloc_internal(struct ivpu_device *vdev, u64 vpu_addr, u64 size, u32 fla
goto err_put;
}
- ivpu_dbg(vdev, BO, "alloc internal: ctx 0 vpu_addr 0x%llx size %zu flags 0x%x\n",
- bo->vpu_addr, ivpu_bo_size(bo), flags);
-
return bo;
err_put:
@@ -708,41 +724,30 @@ static void ivpu_bo_print_info(struct ivpu_bo *bo, struct drm_printer *p)
{
unsigned long dma_refcount = 0;
+ mutex_lock(&bo->lock);
+
if (bo->base.dma_buf && bo->base.dma_buf->file)
dma_refcount = atomic_long_read(&bo->base.dma_buf->file->f_count);
drm_printf(p, "%5u %6d %16llx %10lu %10u %12lu %14s\n",
- bo->ctx->id, bo->handle, bo->vpu_addr, ivpu_bo_size(bo),
+ bo->ctx ? bo->ctx->id : -1, bo->handle, bo->vpu_addr, bo->base.size,
kref_read(&bo->base.refcount), dma_refcount, bo->ops->name);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&bo->lock);
}
void ivpu_bo_list(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_printer *p)
{
struct ivpu_device *vdev = to_ivpu_device(dev);
- struct ivpu_file_priv *file_priv;
- unsigned long ctx_id;
struct ivpu_bo *bo;
drm_printf(p, "%5s %6s %16s %10s %10s %12s %14s\n",
"ctx", "handle", "vpu_addr", "size", "refcount", "dma_refcount", "type");
- mutex_lock(&vdev->gctx.lock);
- list_for_each_entry(bo, &vdev->gctx.bo_list, ctx_node)
+ mutex_lock(&vdev->bo_list_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(bo, &vdev->bo_list, bo_list_node)
ivpu_bo_print_info(bo, p);
- mutex_unlock(&vdev->gctx.lock);
-
- xa_for_each(&vdev->context_xa, ctx_id, file_priv) {
- file_priv = ivpu_file_priv_get_by_ctx_id(vdev, ctx_id);
- if (!file_priv)
- continue;
-
- mutex_lock(&file_priv->ctx.lock);
- list_for_each_entry(bo, &file_priv->ctx.bo_list, ctx_node)
- ivpu_bo_print_info(bo, p);
- mutex_unlock(&file_priv->ctx.lock);
-
- ivpu_file_priv_put(&file_priv);
- }
+ mutex_unlock(&vdev->bo_list_lock);
}
void ivpu_bo_list_print(struct drm_device *dev)
diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.h b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.h
index 9bbbcd779265..214d8fd14310 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.h
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.h
@@ -17,10 +17,10 @@ struct ivpu_bo {
const struct ivpu_bo_ops *ops;
struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx;
- struct list_head ctx_node;
+ struct list_head bo_list_node;
struct drm_mm_node mm_node;
- struct mutex lock; /* Protects: pages, sgt, mmu_mapped */
+ struct mutex lock; /* Protects: pages, sgt, ctx, mmu_mapped, vpu_addr */
struct sg_table *sgt;
struct page **pages;
bool mmu_mapped;
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct ivpu_bo_ops {
};
int ivpu_bo_pin(struct ivpu_bo *bo);
-void ivpu_bo_remove_all_bos_from_context(struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx);
+void ivpu_bo_remove_all_bos_from_context(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx);
void ivpu_bo_list(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_printer *p);
void ivpu_bo_list_print(struct drm_device *dev);
diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu.c
index b46f3743c0e7..2228c44b115f 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu.c
@@ -775,9 +775,12 @@ int ivpu_mmu_init(struct ivpu_device *vdev)
ivpu_dbg(vdev, MMU, "Init..\n");
- drmm_mutex_init(&vdev->drm, &mmu->lock);
ivpu_mmu_config_check(vdev);
+ ret = drmm_mutex_init(&vdev->drm, &mmu->lock);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
ret = ivpu_mmu_structs_alloc(vdev);
if (ret)
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.c
index f6de6a4ea608..122c90fecf66 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.c
@@ -335,6 +335,9 @@ ivpu_mmu_context_map_sgt(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx,
u64 prot;
u64 i;
+ if (drm_WARN_ON(&vdev->drm, !ctx))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (!IS_ALIGNED(vpu_addr, IVPU_MMU_PAGE_SIZE))
return -EINVAL;
/*
@@ -382,8 +385,8 @@ ivpu_mmu_context_unmap_sgt(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_mmu_context *ct
int ret;
u64 i;
- if (!IS_ALIGNED(vpu_addr, IVPU_MMU_PAGE_SIZE))
- ivpu_warn(vdev, "Unaligned vpu_addr: 0x%llx\n", vpu_addr);
+ if (drm_WARN_ON(&vdev->drm, !ctx))
+ return;
mutex_lock(&ctx->lock);
@@ -404,30 +407,34 @@ ivpu_mmu_context_unmap_sgt(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_mmu_context *ct
}
int
-ivpu_mmu_context_insert_node_locked(struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx,
- const struct ivpu_addr_range *range,
- u64 size, struct drm_mm_node *node)
+ivpu_mmu_context_insert_node(struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx, const struct ivpu_addr_range *range,
+ u64 size, struct drm_mm_node *node)
{
- lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
+ int ret;
WARN_ON(!range);
+ mutex_lock(&ctx->lock);
if (!ivpu_disable_mmu_cont_pages && size >= IVPU_MMU_CONT_PAGES_SIZE) {
- if (!drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(&ctx->mm, node, size, IVPU_MMU_CONT_PAGES_SIZE, 0,
- range->start, range->end, DRM_MM_INSERT_BEST))
- return 0;
+ ret = drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(&ctx->mm, node, size, IVPU_MMU_CONT_PAGES_SIZE, 0,
+ range->start, range->end, DRM_MM_INSERT_BEST);
+ if (!ret)
+ goto unlock;
}
- return drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(&ctx->mm, node, size, IVPU_MMU_PAGE_SIZE, 0,
- range->start, range->end, DRM_MM_INSERT_BEST);
+ ret = drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(&ctx->mm, node, size, IVPU_MMU_PAGE_SIZE, 0,
+ range->start, range->end, DRM_MM_INSERT_BEST);
+unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+ return ret;
}
void
-ivpu_mmu_context_remove_node_locked(struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx, struct drm_mm_node *node)
+ivpu_mmu_context_remove_node(struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx, struct drm_mm_node *node)
{
- lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
-
+ mutex_lock(&ctx->lock);
drm_mm_remove_node(node);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
static int
@@ -437,7 +444,6 @@ ivpu_mmu_context_init(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx, u3
int ret;
mutex_init(&ctx->lock);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->bo_list);
ret = ivpu_mmu_pgtable_init(vdev, &ctx->pgtable);
if (ret) {
diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.h b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.h
index f15d8c630d8a..535db3a1fc74 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.h
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.h
@@ -23,10 +23,9 @@ struct ivpu_mmu_pgtable {
};
struct ivpu_mmu_context {
- struct mutex lock; /* protects: mm, pgtable, bo_list */
+ struct mutex lock; /* Protects: mm, pgtable */
struct drm_mm mm;
struct ivpu_mmu_pgtable pgtable;
- struct list_head bo_list;
u32 id;
};
@@ -39,11 +38,9 @@ int ivpu_mmu_user_context_init(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_mmu_context
void ivpu_mmu_user_context_fini(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx);
void ivpu_mmu_user_context_mark_invalid(struct ivpu_device *vdev, u32 ssid);
-int ivpu_mmu_context_insert_node_locked(struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx,
- const struct ivpu_addr_range *range,
- u64 size, struct drm_mm_node *node);
-void ivpu_mmu_context_remove_node_locked(struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx,
- struct drm_mm_node *node);
+int ivpu_mmu_context_insert_node(struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx, const struct ivpu_addr_range *range,
+ u64 size, struct drm_mm_node *node);
+void ivpu_mmu_context_remove_node(struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx, struct drm_mm_node *node);
int ivpu_mmu_context_map_sgt(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_mmu_context *ctx,
u64 vpu_addr, struct sg_table *sgt, bool llc_coherent);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-31 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-31 7:31 [PATCH 0/4] accel/ivpu: Use GEM shmem Stanislaw Gruszka
2023-10-31 7:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] accel/ivpu: Allocate vpu_addr in gem->open() callback Stanislaw Gruszka
2023-10-31 7:31 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2023-10-31 7:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] accel/ivpu: Remove support for uncached buffers Stanislaw Gruszka
2023-10-31 7:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] accel/ivpu: Use GEM shmem helper for all buffers Stanislaw Gruszka
2023-11-08 15:30 ` [PATCH 0/4] accel/ivpu: Use GEM shmem Jacek Lawrynowicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231031073156.1301669-3-stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com \
--to=stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ogabbay@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_jhugo@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.