From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>,
catherine.hoang@oracle.com, cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, dchinner@redhat.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
osandov@fb.com, ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs-linux: for-next updated to 22c2699cb068
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:43:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231031164359.GA1041814@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231031090242.GA25889@lst.de>
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 10:02:42AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Can you also pick up:
>
> "xfs: only remap the written blocks in xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent"
>
> ?
>
> Also this seems to a bit of a mix of fixes for 6.7 and big stuff that
> is too late for the merge window.
If by 'big stuff' you mean the MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE patch, then yes, I
agree that it's too late to be changing code outside xfs. Bumping that
to 6.8 will disappoint Shiyang, regrettably.
The patchsets for realtime units refactoring and typechecked rt-helpers
(except for the xfs_rtalloc_args thing) I'd prefer to land in 6.7 for a
few reasons. First, the blast radii are contained to the rtalloc
subsystem of xfs. Second, I've been testing them for nearly a year now,
I think they're ready from a QA perspective.
The third selfish reason for wanting to get the xfs realtime stuff off
my plate is that my goal for 6.8 is to try to eliminate the indirect
->iomap_begin/end calls from iomap. It'll be helpful for me to be able
to focus exclusively on that since I'd really like your help making sure
I do the transition correctly. :)
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-31 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-30 5:46 [ANNOUNCE] xfs-linux: for-next updated to 22c2699cb068 Chandan Babu R
2023-10-30 5:46 ` Chandan Babu R
2023-10-31 9:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-31 10:47 ` Chandan Babu R
2023-10-31 16:43 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2023-10-31 17:02 ` Chandan Babu R
2023-11-01 11:30 ` Shiyang Ruan
2023-10-31 17:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231031164359.GA1041814@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
--cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
--cc=cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.