From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>,
users@linux.kernel.org, ksummit@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [workflows]RFC: switching "THE REST" in MAINTAINERS away from linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 17:29:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231106172932.01bce954@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231106110547.6956a430@gandalf.local.home>
Hello Konstantin,
rostedt@goodmis.org wrote on Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:05:47 -0500:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:33:21 -0500
> Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > For this reason, I propose switching the "F: *" entry in MAINTAINERS
> > ("THE REST") to patches@lists.linux.dev instead. This list differs from LKML
> > in the following important aspects:
>
> As long as it doesn't affect those that have L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>
> All core kernel changes should still go there.
>
> (Scheduler, timing, tracing, interrupts, etc)
There are many MAINTAINERS entries without explicit mailing-list which
are not really 'core kernel' areas. If we consider
patches@lists.linux.dev as an archive-only list, then
maybe get_maintainers.pl should somehow fallback to
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org anyway when no list pops-up?
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-06 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-06 15:33 RFC: switching "THE REST" in MAINTAINERS away from linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-11-06 15:43 ` Joe Perches
2023-11-06 15:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-11-06 16:05 ` [workflows]RFC: " Steven Rostedt
2023-11-06 16:29 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2023-11-06 17:45 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-11-08 16:19 ` Joe Perches
2023-11-08 16:44 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-08 18:16 ` Joe Perches
2023-11-08 19:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-11-08 19:14 ` Joe Perches
2023-11-08 19:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-11-08 20:07 ` [workflows]Re: " Steven Rostedt
2023-11-08 20:14 ` Joe Perches
2023-11-08 20:36 ` Joe Perches
2023-11-08 20:49 ` Joe Perches
2023-11-08 20:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-11-08 21:04 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-11-08 21:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-11-08 20:41 ` Joe Perches
2023-11-09 11:21 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-09 11:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-11-09 8:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-11-09 9:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-11-09 17:14 ` Alex Elder
2023-11-09 17:25 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-11-09 19:11 ` Joe Perches
2023-11-09 19:38 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-11-09 23:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-10 0:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-10 17:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-11-10 17:24 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-11-10 17:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-11-10 17:24 ` Rob Herring
2023-11-10 18:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-11-09 15:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-11-09 16:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-11-09 16:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-11-06 16:11 ` RFC: " Eric W. Biederman
2023-11-06 17:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-06 17:41 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-11-09 3:55 ` Ian Kelling
2023-11-11 16:57 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-11-07 4:04 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-11-06 17:21 ` Eric Wong
2023-11-06 17:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2023-11-09 14:24 ` Naveen N Rao
2023-11-06 17:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2023-11-06 20:52 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-11-06 21:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-11-06 22:52 ` Pavel Machek
2023-11-07 9:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-07 10:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-11-07 10:42 ` Greg KH
2023-11-07 12:14 ` Pratyush Yadav
2023-11-07 12:47 ` Julia Lawall
2023-11-07 13:18 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-11-07 13:23 ` Pratyush Yadav
2023-11-07 16:35 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-11-07 16:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-07 16:51 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-11-10 10:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-07 10:47 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-07 13:24 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-11-08 20:04 ` Bird, Tim
2023-11-08 21:03 ` Luck, Tony
2023-11-08 21:04 ` James Bottomley
2023-11-08 21:18 ` Johannes Berg
2023-11-08 21:30 ` Rob Herring
2023-11-21 14:53 ` Joe Perches
2023-11-21 18:08 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231106172932.01bce954@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=users@linux.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.