All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thinker.li@gmail.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
	drosen@google.com
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
	Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v11 05/13] bpf: make struct_ops_map support btfs other than btf_vmlinux.
Date: Mon,  6 Nov 2023 12:12:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231106201252.1568931-6-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231106201252.1568931-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>

From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>

Once new struct_ops can be registered from modules, btf_vmlinux is not
longer the only btf tht struct_ops_map would face.  st_map should remember
what btf it should use to get type information.

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index d804801c7864..a0291877a792 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops_map {
 	 * "links[]".
 	 */
 	void *image;
+	/* The owner moduler's btf. */
+	struct btf *btf;
 	/* uvalue->data stores the kernel struct
 	 * (e.g. tcp_congestion_ops) that is more useful
 	 * to userspace than the kvalue.  For example,
@@ -314,7 +316,7 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_map_put_progs(struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map)
 	}
 }
 
-static int check_zero_holes(const struct btf_type *t, void *data)
+static int check_zero_holes(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t, void *data)
 {
 	const struct btf_member *member;
 	u32 i, moff, msize, prev_mend = 0;
@@ -326,8 +328,8 @@ static int check_zero_holes(const struct btf_type *t, void *data)
 		    memchr_inv(data + prev_mend, 0, moff - prev_mend))
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		mtype = btf_type_by_id(btf_vmlinux, member->type);
-		mtype = btf_resolve_size(btf_vmlinux, mtype, &msize);
+		mtype = btf_type_by_id(btf, member->type);
+		mtype = btf_resolve_size(btf, mtype, &msize);
 		if (IS_ERR(mtype))
 			return PTR_ERR(mtype);
 		prev_mend = moff + msize;
@@ -395,12 +397,12 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 	if (*(u32 *)key != 0)
 		return -E2BIG;
 
-	err = check_zero_holes(st_ops_desc->value_type, value);
+	err = check_zero_holes(st_map->btf, st_ops_desc->value_type, value);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
 	uvalue = value;
-	err = check_zero_holes(t, uvalue->data);
+	err = check_zero_holes(st_map->btf, t, uvalue->data);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -436,7 +438,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 		u32 moff;
 
 		moff = __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8;
-		ptype = btf_type_resolve_ptr(btf_vmlinux, member->type, NULL);
+		ptype = btf_type_resolve_ptr(st_map->btf, member->type, NULL);
 		if (ptype == module_type) {
 			if (*(void **)(udata + moff))
 				goto reset_unlock;
@@ -461,8 +463,8 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 		if (!ptype || !btf_type_is_func_proto(ptype)) {
 			u32 msize;
 
-			mtype = btf_type_by_id(btf_vmlinux, member->type);
-			mtype = btf_resolve_size(btf_vmlinux, mtype, &msize);
+			mtype = btf_type_by_id(st_map->btf, member->type);
+			mtype = btf_resolve_size(st_map->btf, mtype, &msize);
 			if (IS_ERR(mtype)) {
 				err = PTR_ERR(mtype);
 				goto reset_unlock;
@@ -601,6 +603,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 static void bpf_struct_ops_map_seq_show_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 					     struct seq_file *m)
 {
+	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map = (struct bpf_struct_ops_map *)map;
 	void *value;
 	int err;
 
@@ -610,7 +613,8 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_map_seq_show_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 
 	err = bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(map, key, value);
 	if (!err) {
-		btf_type_seq_show(btf_vmlinux, map->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id,
+		btf_type_seq_show(st_map->btf,
+				  map->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id,
 				  value, m);
 		seq_puts(m, "\n");
 	}
@@ -720,6 +724,8 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
 
+	st_map->btf = btf_vmlinux;
+
 	mutex_init(&st_map->lock);
 	set_vm_flush_reset_perms(st_map->image);
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(map, attr);
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-06 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-06 20:12 [PATCH bpf-next v11 00/13] Registrating struct_ops types from modules thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 01/13] bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function thinker.li
2023-11-10  1:11   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-21 23:53     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 02/13] bpf: get type information with BPF_ID_LIST thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 03/13] bpf, net: introduce bpf_struct_ops_desc thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 04/13] bpf: add struct_ops_tab to btf thinker.li
2023-11-10  1:35   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22  2:27     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` thinker.li [this message]
2023-11-10  1:40   ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 05/13] bpf: make struct_ops_map support btfs other than btf_vmlinux Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22  2:28     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 06/13] bpf: lookup struct_ops types from a given module BTF thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 07/13] bpf: pass attached BTF to the bpf_struct_ops subsystem thinker.li
2023-11-10  2:04   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 22:33     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-27 22:08       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 08/13] bpf: hold module for bpf_struct_ops_map thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 09/13] bpf: validate value_type thinker.li
2023-11-10  2:11   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 23:47     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 10/13] bpf, net: switch to dynamic registration thinker.li
2023-11-10  2:19   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 23:53     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 11/13] libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 12/13] bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules thinker.li
2023-11-06 20:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 13/13] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops() thinker.li
2023-11-10  2:23   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-22 23:59     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-17 10:45   ` Hou Tao
2023-11-23  0:00     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-11-10  6:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 00/13] Registrating struct_ops types from modules Martin KaFai Lau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231106201252.1568931-6-thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drosen@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.