From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1256629CF6; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 20:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bC5N4dGm" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62F79C433C8; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 20:49:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1699303779; bh=1ojN924qEHttCwp4v9QEGZRz/p6BrttrFZ8fMDi8jpA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bC5N4dGm7TEY4nZ4PrDuV+pyZoNwoPz08WhnP6WiFLNehEuknMnqvvl3pANLzO67k /KQBtv/Q7z1Of+i30DSEUgyRdaT9mybZz8QUuZWtrSlK/wNob+gevwij/06hOeueOn lsJ2IlnRIgsxk111caCUnm/UFvvupS15XTwtZebecLtiQDyRiqzjN6CSDY16/sTtzz SnfC/egyneb6P83Dtm3PMTGy1lwGFdEUUAAgvj6CAZW54BB44Z7vMnFyz7Kq7KBaP3 HKq2nptBvLD1c7Iw09MkFlcwfqD6gwq+lDVBRF8Nb66dr7cKqurjKxYw62reqy15n+ KbachTLGfl8UA== From: SeongJae Park To: Deepak R Varma Cc: Dan Carpenter , SeongJae Park , Andrew Morton , damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/damon/sysfs: eliminate potential uninitialized variable warning Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 20:49:37 +0000 Message-Id: <20231106204937.48488-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello Deepak, On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 00:35:55 +0530 Deepak R Varma wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 05:07:40PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > The "err" variable is not initialized if damon_target_has_pid(ctx) is > > false and sys_target->regions->nr is zero. > > > > Fixes: 0bcd216c4741 ("mm/damon/sysfs: update monitoring target regions for online input commit") > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > Should this be a void function instead as the caller is not checking the return > value. As I mentioned on a previous reply[1], I think the caller should check the return value. I will send the fix for that soon. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/damon/20231106165205.48264-1-sj@kernel.org/ Thanks, SJ > > regards, > deepak. > > > > > >