From: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com>
To: linkinjeon@kernel.org, sj1557.seo@samsung.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] exfat: Fix uninit-value access in __exfat_write_inode()
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 23:30:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231107143002.1342295-1-syoshida@redhat.com> (raw)
KMSAN reported the following uninit-value access issue:
=====================================================
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in exfat_set_entry_time+0x309/0x360 fs/exfat/misc.c:99
exfat_set_entry_time+0x309/0x360 fs/exfat/misc.c:99
__exfat_write_inode+0x7ae/0xdb0 fs/exfat/inode.c:59
__exfat_truncate+0x70e/0xb20 fs/exfat/file.c:163
exfat_truncate+0x121/0x540 fs/exfat/file.c:211
exfat_setattr+0x116c/0x1a40 fs/exfat/file.c:312
notify_change+0x1934/0x1a30 fs/attr.c:499
do_truncate+0x224/0x2a0 fs/open.c:66
handle_truncate fs/namei.c:3280 [inline]
do_open fs/namei.c:3626 [inline]
path_openat+0x56c6/0x5f20 fs/namei.c:3779
do_filp_open+0x21c/0x5a0 fs/namei.c:3809
do_sys_openat2+0x1ba/0x2f0 fs/open.c:1440
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1455 [inline]
__do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1531 [inline]
__se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1525 [inline]
__x64_sys_creat+0xe3/0x140 fs/open.c:1525
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x44/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
Uninit was stored to memory at:
exfat_set_entry_time+0x302/0x360 fs/exfat/misc.c:99
__exfat_write_inode+0x7ae/0xdb0 fs/exfat/inode.c:59
__exfat_truncate+0x70e/0xb20 fs/exfat/file.c:163
exfat_truncate+0x121/0x540 fs/exfat/file.c:211
exfat_setattr+0x116c/0x1a40 fs/exfat/file.c:312
notify_change+0x1934/0x1a30 fs/attr.c:499
do_truncate+0x224/0x2a0 fs/open.c:66
handle_truncate fs/namei.c:3280 [inline]
do_open fs/namei.c:3626 [inline]
path_openat+0x56c6/0x5f20 fs/namei.c:3779
do_filp_open+0x21c/0x5a0 fs/namei.c:3809
do_sys_openat2+0x1ba/0x2f0 fs/open.c:1440
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1455 [inline]
__do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1531 [inline]
__se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1525 [inline]
__x64_sys_creat+0xe3/0x140 fs/open.c:1525
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x44/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
Local variable ts created at:
__exfat_write_inode+0x102/0xdb0 fs/exfat/inode.c:29
__exfat_truncate+0x70e/0xb20 fs/exfat/file.c:163
CPU: 0 PID: 13839 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.6.0-14500-g1c41041124bd #10
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-1.fc38 04/01/2014
=====================================================
Commit 4c72a36edd54 ("exfat: convert to new timestamp accessors") changed
__exfat_write_inode() to use new timestamp accessor functions.
As for mtime, inode_set_mtime_to_ts() is called after
exfat_set_entry_time(). This causes the above issue because `ts` is not
initialized when exfat_set_entry_time() is called. The same issue can occur
for atime.
This patch resolves this issue by calling inode_get_mtime() and
inode_get_atime() before exfat_set_entry_time() to initialize `ts`.
Fixes: 4c72a36edd54 ("exfat: convert to new timestamp accessors")
Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com>
---
fs/exfat/inode.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exfat/inode.c b/fs/exfat/inode.c
index 875234179d1f..e7ff58b8e68c 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/inode.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/inode.c
@@ -56,18 +56,18 @@ int __exfat_write_inode(struct inode *inode, int sync)
&ep->dentry.file.create_time,
&ep->dentry.file.create_date,
&ep->dentry.file.create_time_cs);
+ ts = inode_get_mtime(inode);
exfat_set_entry_time(sbi, &ts,
&ep->dentry.file.modify_tz,
&ep->dentry.file.modify_time,
&ep->dentry.file.modify_date,
&ep->dentry.file.modify_time_cs);
- inode_set_mtime_to_ts(inode, ts);
+ ts = inode_get_atime(inode);
exfat_set_entry_time(sbi, &ts,
&ep->dentry.file.access_tz,
&ep->dentry.file.access_time,
&ep->dentry.file.access_date,
NULL);
- inode_set_atime_to_ts(inode, ts);
/* File size should be zero if there is no cluster allocated */
on_disk_size = i_size_read(inode);
--
2.41.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-11-07 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20231107143021epcas1p304b8b94862a8f28d264714f06a624674@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2023-11-07 14:30 ` Shigeru Yoshida [this message]
2023-11-08 4:35 ` [PATCH] exfat: Fix uninit-value access in __exfat_write_inode() Sungjong Seo
2023-11-08 5:52 ` Shigeru Yoshida
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231107143002.1342295-1-syoshida@redhat.com \
--to=syoshida@redhat.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.