Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH v2] virtio-net: support distinguishing between partial and full checksum

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:55:01AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > Most userspace doesn't care about the checksum though.
> > >
> > > > Maybe we need a flag
> > > > to say which offloads are expensive?
> > > >
> > >
> > > That exposes some device details which seem not good (e.g we may want
> > > to do migration among hardware and software).
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> > If you do then things will be less well tuned on one of the migration
> > ends but then that is by design, isn't it?
> 
> Ok, so I'm fine to enable it by default.
> 
> Thanks

I was really asking a question. Is it true that full is more expensive
than partial for the device? So it should only be enabled if
strictly required?

> >
> > --
> > MST
> >


This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/