From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32DA5208B0 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 17:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="WU0Pbmyd" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1699550021; x=1731086021; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=FEKRKpTPHUkF0IeMd0huz4xkZFQxYlY7u6PlLsg9G+A=; b=WU0PbmydLvXRZl2PW4zcCAMwEOt/1ldBsDAoW/kGqvC5QBDOOzrpGa2W nuVTFdtAlmoZyaYytAcoAoIZ1CRylbeAdycupDQa5DFdkXYMIo2RZ4fLr yOyQGfX3GR/2rxWxWIHIJEOCiyHdK9u3O/Ussi+j4KVQfxXsKCLVVC6ux 6AA2EdgQz8rmeGLym8o6Tz01sGYoupg4uHsAo4EzKejj2lcm8L/tsHIFL flq9K0bSdd8JxEnfac88NT9pjVVgbP1NyqRR0OKHnnSUdSoybVAq4AuhG p5R+vWPtCqRmqqgCVMYraBMzvsAVa2PepWbw8jBMPHVdiWaZ8Z71KpTQ1 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10889"; a="392900744" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,289,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="392900744" Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Nov 2023 09:13:36 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10889"; a="767066889" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,289,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="767066889" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 17d9e85e5079) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2023 09:13:35 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 17d9e85e5079 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1r18az-0008x0-0e; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 17:13:33 +0000 Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 01:09:32 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Otavio Salvador Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [freescale-fslc:6.1-2.1.x-imx 126/15770] sound/soc/fsl/fsl_easrc_m2m.c:19:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'fsl_easrc_get_status' was not declared. Should it be static? Message-ID: <202311100043.3vRGLPQk-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://github.com/Freescale/linux-fslc 6.1-2.1.x-imx head: 742924a05c8a6349d6d1fe67010a3c5ed54df884 commit: 46ac86d263c28d721f9f740b0e31d488ee95bc43 [126/15770] MLK-21940-4: ASoC: fsl_easrc: Support the m2m function config: i386-randconfig-063-20231024 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231110/202311100043.3vRGLPQk-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231110/202311100043.3vRGLPQk-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311100043.3vRGLPQk-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) sound/soc/fsl/fsl_easrc.c: note: in included file: >> sound/soc/fsl/fsl_easrc_m2m.c:19:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'fsl_easrc_get_status' was not declared. Should it be static? >> sound/soc/fsl/fsl_easrc_m2m.c:282:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'fsl_easrc_process_buffer_pre' was not declared. Should it be static? >> sound/soc/fsl/fsl_easrc_m2m.c:415:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'fsl_easrc_submit_dma' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/fsl_easrc_get_status +19 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_easrc_m2m.c 18 > 19 void fsl_easrc_get_status(struct fsl_asrc_pair *ctx, 20 struct asrc_status_flags *flags) 21 { 22 flags->overload_error = 0; 23 } 24 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki