From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95AC038DDB for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 18:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Pxz0WsEU" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1699639826; x=1731175826; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ffswlVxX3Tb0N6fwMUfnP1kWgA6aE/pzU8XOuXS035s=; b=Pxz0WsEUJbsr2oAhweqCM++G+rChVLvbDDhbQYWY9wJunhujV/tn78qf IwgEIu7FF6+NWzgJNzCfP05sR81qLE3N0MpHoUziYCmfuEyYhLZYhnvsS w6CL0QVQc3V3CYSHqw65W5WML8U7ez2c5UP4iDy1PvKiuNJnd4oaUmc/Y wE+kn9eZMccPGTpQ9RDYJA+i9g8SBNZUAvB0gI5oV9vghOOxmjqDlmFAB PqnHjIgpu9+htxfdPfmuraPIGrG6/alIW3GT8XyJtxLAre3jj+3PD8ZDd HP67JPwTOdzHBa2gCmP646DOeLJFpMwAPu51SuSCXhSSilzGrbTpUhVZi Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10890"; a="387381053" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,291,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="387381053" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Nov 2023 10:10:25 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10890"; a="881024267" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,291,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="881024267" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 17d9e85e5079) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2023 10:10:24 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 17d9e85e5079 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1r1VxW-0009o6-1i; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 18:10:22 +0000 Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:09:16 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Christian Hopps Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC ipsec-next 5/8] iptfs: netlink: add config (netlink) options Message-ID: <202311110118.MvEGQstw-lkp@intel.com> References: <20231110113719.3055788-6-chopps@chopps.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231110113719.3055788-6-chopps@chopps.org> Hi Christian, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on klassert-ipsec-next/master] [also build test ERROR on klassert-ipsec/master netfilter-nf/main linus/master v6.6 next-20231110] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Hopps/iptfs-uapi-ip-add-ip_tfs_-_hdr-packet-formats/20231110-203822 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231110113719.3055788-6-chopps%40chopps.org patch subject: [RFC ipsec-next 5/8] iptfs: netlink: add config (netlink) options config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-004-20231110 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231111/202311110118.MvEGQstw-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231111/202311110118.MvEGQstw-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311110118.MvEGQstw-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from : In function 'xfrm_xlate32_attr', inlined from 'xfrm_xlate32' at net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c:575:9: >> include/linux/compiler_types.h:425:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_709' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: XFRMA_MAX != XFRMA_MTIMER_THRESH 425 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) | ^ include/linux/compiler_types.h:406:25: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert' 406 | prefix ## suffix(); \ | ^~~~~~ include/linux/compiler_types.h:425:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert' 425 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert' 39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG' 50 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c:437:17: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON' 437 | BUILD_BUG_ON(XFRMA_MAX != XFRMA_MTIMER_THRESH); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c: In function 'xfrm_xlate64_attr': include/linux/compiler_types.h:425:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_708' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: XFRMA_MAX != XFRMA_MTIMER_THRESH 425 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) | ^ include/linux/compiler_types.h:406:25: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert' 406 | prefix ## suffix(); \ | ^~~~~~ include/linux/compiler_types.h:425:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert' 425 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert' 39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG' 50 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c:282:17: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON' 282 | BUILD_BUG_ON(XFRMA_MAX != XFRMA_MTIMER_THRESH); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/__compiletime_assert_709 +425 include/linux/compiler_types.h eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 411 eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 412 #define _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix) \ eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 413 __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix) eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 414 eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 415 /** eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 416 * compiletime_assert - break build and emit msg if condition is false eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 417 * @condition: a compile-time constant condition to check eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 418 * @msg: a message to emit if condition is false eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 419 * eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 420 * In tradition of POSIX assert, this macro will break the build if the eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 421 * supplied condition is *false*, emitting the supplied error message if the eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 422 * compiler has support to do so. eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 423 */ eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 424 #define compiletime_assert(condition, msg) \ eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 @425 _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 426 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki