From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] lib/vsprintf: Fix %pfwf when current node refcount == 0
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 16:26:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231114152655.409331-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> (raw)
A refcount issue can appeared in __fwnode_link_del() due to the
pr_debug() call:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 901 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xe5/0x110
Call Trace:
<TASK>
...
of_node_get+0x1e/0x30
of_fwnode_get+0x28/0x40
fwnode_full_name_string+0x34/0x90
fwnode_string+0xdb/0x140
...
vsnprintf+0x17b/0x630
...
__fwnode_link_del+0x25/0xa0
fwnode_links_purge+0x39/0xb0
of_node_release+0xd9/0x180
...
Indeed, an fwnode (of_node) is being destroyed and so, of_node_release()
is called because the of_node refcount reached 0.
From of_node_release() several function calls are done and lead to
a pr_debug() calls with %pfwf to print the fwnode full name.
The issue is not present if we change %pfwf to %pfwP.
To print the full name, %pfwf iterates over the current node and its
parents and obtain/drop a reference to all nodes involved.
In order to allow to print the full name (%pfwf) of a node while it is
being destroyed, do not obtain/drop a reference to this current node.
Fixes: a92eb7621b9f ("lib/vsprintf: Make use of fwnode API to obtain node names and separators")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes v2 -> v3
- Fix typo in comment ("ie parents node" -> "i.e. parent nodes")
- Add 'Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>'
- Add 'Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>'
Changes v1 -> v2
- Avoid handling current node out of the loop. Instead obtain/drop references
in the loop based on the depth value.
- Remove some of the backtrace lines in the commit log.
lib/vsprintf.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index afb88b24fa74..2aa408441cd3 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -2110,15 +2110,20 @@ char *fwnode_full_name_string(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, char *buf,
/* Loop starting from the root node to the current node. */
for (depth = fwnode_count_parents(fwnode); depth >= 0; depth--) {
- struct fwnode_handle *__fwnode =
- fwnode_get_nth_parent(fwnode, depth);
+ /*
+ * Only get a reference for other nodes (i.e. parent nodes).
+ * fwnode refcount may be 0 here.
+ */
+ struct fwnode_handle *__fwnode = depth ?
+ fwnode_get_nth_parent(fwnode, depth) : fwnode;
buf = string(buf, end, fwnode_get_name_prefix(__fwnode),
default_str_spec);
buf = string(buf, end, fwnode_get_name(__fwnode),
default_str_spec);
- fwnode_handle_put(__fwnode);
+ if (depth)
+ fwnode_handle_put(__fwnode);
}
return buf;
--
2.41.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-11-14 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-14 15:26 Herve Codina [this message]
2023-12-06 10:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] lib/vsprintf: Fix %pfwf when current node refcount == 0 Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231114152655.409331-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.