Re: [net-next PATCH v7 01/10] netdev-genl: spec: Extend netdev netlink spec in YAML for queue

[Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>]

On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 13:05:24 -0800 Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
> We could drop the word "queue" from all attrs of queue-object and also 
> the word "napi" from all attrs of napi-object. Only concern is, queue 
> object will have NAPI-ID as "napi-id" while the napi object will have 
> NAPI-ID as "id". Same values but referred to as "id" and "napi-id" 
> depending on the object (although should be fine as the command names 
> carry the object names).
> Here's an example how this would look:
> 
> $ queue-get  --json='{"ifindex": 12, "id": 0, "type": 0}'
> {'ifindex': 12, 'napi-id': 593, 'id': 0, 'type': 'rx'}
> 
> $ napi-get --json='{"id": 593}'
> {'ifindex': 12, 'irq': 291, 'id': 593, 'pid': 3817}
> 
> Let me know if this is okay.

It's a bit of a judgment call. The CLI JSON obviously looks fine with 
the $obj-id format, perhaps even a tiny bit more consistent. 
But the C uAPI defines are unpleasant with the NETDEV_$OBJ_$OBJ_ID
repetition. And I think the same thing would happen in Python code.

I'm guessing user may end up writing code like:

	queue = netdev.get_queue({'id': X, 'type': "rx"})
	do_something_with(queue_id=queue["id"])

which seems pretty clear. With the $obj-id it'd be:

	queue = netdev.get_queue({'queue-id': X, 'queue-type': "rx"})
                           ^^^^^   ^^^^^          ^^^^^
	do_something_with(queue_id=queue["queue-id"])
                          ^^^^^    ^^^^^  ^^^^^

IOW we'd also say "queue" a lot...

So yes, I'm only 80% sure we won't regret this but let's drop the 
$obj AKA queue / napi prefix.