From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E28A218E09 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 07:19:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Xjm1Jmag" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1700637589; x=1732173589; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=HQBneX5mihgVneYMkNvY4OGh3qZtIP48ic65rhciGh8=; b=Xjm1Jmagoot0uw8Awn/TeVFT17SB+wW+qhO6meKPYiEWKM7BYp6OtPtP 5/UX9viZeFB9gfcdAqEBUXhbeo6YhX1R3KTls9167q8IVwZByKTRbIBFa w8UIJYsr9um6tzEhGAy04X5zVCXZFLLYmToSM/Nx+pXR42QoEMU9OvB2a JPbXXZ3LB559CPnhLLyMOAO1VpFbP9gxN7Hu8TYImlkidAKMzCBT2EffM YMm7JNs+rpJ20SnTY0pxLrX9ryM9Yt6UfYhdYOseKms47ySdpo0lqv/H4 qkc1DpQtprJ6uDTDRK87OKiDYrVPO7gu/8F8VN0fuQN34K5z3SgZuXXKH g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10901"; a="382395294" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,218,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="382395294" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Nov 2023 23:19:49 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10901"; a="890469467" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,218,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="890469467" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d584ee6ebdcc) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Nov 2023 23:19:48 -0800 Received: from kbuild by d584ee6ebdcc with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1r5hWU-0000Bl-0C; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 07:19:46 +0000 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:19:27 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Micka=EBl_Sala=FCn?= Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 12/19] x86: Implement the Memory Table feature to store arbitrary per-page data Message-ID: <202311221345.9sPNLiAU-lkp@intel.com> References: <20231113022326.24388-13-mic@digikod.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20231113022326.24388-13-mic@digikod.net> Hi Mickaël, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 881375a408c0f4ea451ff14545b59216d2923881] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Micka-l-Sala-n/virt-Introduce-Hypervisor-Enforced-Kernel-Integrity-Heki/20231113-102847 base: 881375a408c0f4ea451ff14545b59216d2923881 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231113022326.24388-13-mic%40digikod.net patch subject: [RFC PATCH v2 12/19] x86: Implement the Memory Table feature to store arbitrary per-page data config: x86_64-randconfig-123-20231122 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231122/202311221345.9sPNLiAU-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231122/202311221345.9sPNLiAU-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311221345.9sPNLiAU-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> kernel/mem_table.c:47:14: sparse: sparse: symbol 'mem_table_base_level' was not declared. Should it be static? >> kernel/mem_table.c:48:14: sparse: sparse: symbol 'mem_table_nlevels' was not declared. Should it be static? >> kernel/mem_table.c:49:24: sparse: sparse: symbol 'mem_table_levels' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/mem_table_base_level +47 kernel/mem_table.c 42 43 /* 44 * Within this feature, the table levels start from 0. On X86, the base level 45 * is not 0. 46 */ > 47 unsigned int mem_table_base_level __ro_after_init; > 48 unsigned int mem_table_nlevels __ro_after_init; > 49 struct mem_table_level mem_table_levels[CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS] __ro_after_init; 50 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki