All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
Cc: tony@atomide.com, robh@kernel.org, wens@csie.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: twl6030-irq: Revert to use of_match_device()
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:41:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231123104108.GF1184245@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231123103756.GD1184245@google.com>

On Thu, 23 Nov 2023, Lee Jones wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Oct 2023, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> 
> > The core twl chip is probed via i2c and the dev->driver->of_match_table is
> > NULL, causing the driver to fail to probe.
> > 
> > This partially reverts commit 1e0c866887f4.
> > 
> > Fixes: 1e0c866887f4 ("mfd: Use device_get_match_data() in a bunch of drivers")
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c | 10 +++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
> > index f9fce8408c2c..3c03681c124c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
> > @@ -24,10 +24,10 @@
> >  #include <linux/kthread.h>
> >  #include <linux/mfd/twl.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > -#include <linux/property.h>
> >  #include <linux/suspend.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> >  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> >  
> >  #include "twl-core.h"
> >  
> > @@ -368,10 +368,10 @@ int twl6030_init_irq(struct device *dev, int irq_num)
> >  	int			nr_irqs;
> >  	int			status;
> >  	u8			mask[3];
> > -	const int		*irq_tbl;
> > +	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> >  
> > -	irq_tbl = device_get_match_data(dev);
> > -	if (!irq_tbl) {
> > +	of_id = of_match_device(twl6030_of_match, dev);
> 
> I think you just dropped support for ACPI.

Ah, scrap that.  I was looking at the wrong part of 1e0c866887f4.

So what about the other drivers changed in the aforementioned commit?

Ideally we'd have a call that covers all of the various probing APIs.

> Rob, care to follow-up?

I'd still like Rob to comment.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-23 10:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-29 11:48 [PATCH] mfd: twl6030-irq: Revert to use of_match_device() Peter Ujfalusi
2023-11-23 10:37 ` Lee Jones
2023-11-23 10:41   ` Lee Jones [this message]
2023-11-23 15:40     ` Péter Ujfalusi
2023-11-30 14:05       ` Lee Jones
2023-12-01 11:30 ` (subset) " Lee Jones
2024-02-19  9:52 ` Andreas Schwab
2024-02-19 14:33   ` Lee Jones
2024-02-26 11:36     ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231123104108.GF1184245@google.com \
    --to=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.