From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B84CD1EB4B for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="E0lt9hLQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1700826456; x=1732362456; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=SJq3Goz2QqTYji6GbFCD2g62Cp3HeHc+BLwZFMxWzek=; b=E0lt9hLQd8QTkik5XqjWyDyJXcZdOh/1Xch1RcxcWrPT0oBcJrCCLKoh nhCl7QWWUWP8UG3O7IMz7rij9WTqkDDql7H+/wvgKZwNonbTjvgoM2naI EyDX67uH0pyM1JSvDGpgO4VwBo3BwXV2tytfPCNwrfqmL0+Vhb/hnqau6 FMAI2DyUkCdnLWXwox7rYAyXuUSZrtM/tX5RvM7yWwT3YR1QQrCxS7K6p acDA00ZVJxIyRvOdkVW/dfHDHu+06awNv2eQkMIozOuSkqlbKOpepAZaX KVU8xDNuocrPvA2Qo5ppZTPMgT7ttKGH/c1htLIghTQQcaiNedPMWA8NS A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10902"; a="395227080" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,223,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="395227080" Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Nov 2023 03:47:36 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10902"; a="771236110" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,223,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="771236110" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d584ee6ebdcc) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2023 03:47:35 -0800 Received: from kbuild by d584ee6ebdcc with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1r6Uej-0002i7-0G; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:47:33 +0000 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 19:46:40 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Alexandru Elisei Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 05/27] mm: page_alloc: Add an arch hook to allow prep_new_page() to fail Message-ID: <202311241432.JzkJ8cZz-lkp@intel.com> References: <20231119165721.9849-6-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231119165721.9849-6-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> Hi Alexandru, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alexandru-Elisei/arm64-mte-Rework-naming-for-tag-manipulation-functions/20231120-010227 base: b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231119165721.9849-6-alexandru.elisei%40arm.com patch subject: [PATCH RFC v2 05/27] mm: page_alloc: Add an arch hook to allow prep_new_page() to fail config: arm-randconfig-002-20231123 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231124/202311241432.JzkJ8cZz-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231124/202311241432.JzkJ8cZz-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311241432.JzkJ8cZz-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): mm/page_alloc.c: In function 'prep_new_page': >> mm/page_alloc.c:1546:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_prep_new_page'; did you mean 'prep_new_page'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 1546 | ret = arch_prep_new_page(page, order, gfp_flags); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | prep_new_page cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +1546 mm/page_alloc.c 1540 1541 static int prep_new_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order, gfp_t gfp_flags, 1542 unsigned int alloc_flags) 1543 { 1544 int ret; 1545 > 1546 ret = arch_prep_new_page(page, order, gfp_flags); 1547 if (unlikely(ret)) 1548 return ret; 1549 1550 post_alloc_hook(page, order, gfp_flags); 1551 1552 if (order && (gfp_flags & __GFP_COMP)) 1553 prep_compound_page(page, order); 1554 1555 /* 1556 * page is set pfmemalloc when ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS was necessary to 1557 * allocate the page. The expectation is that the caller is taking 1558 * steps that will free more memory. The caller should avoid the page 1559 * being used for !PFMEMALLOC purposes. 1560 */ 1561 if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS) 1562 set_page_pfmemalloc(page); 1563 else 1564 clear_page_pfmemalloc(page); 1565 1566 return 0; 1567 } 1568 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki