All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
	andre.draszik@linaro.org, quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Avoid more races around device probe
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:35:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231124153520.GA558245@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16f433658661d7cadfea51e7c65da95826112a2b.1700071477.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>

On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 06:25:44PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> It turns out there are more subtle races beyond just the main part of
> __iommu_probe_device() itself running in parallel - the dev_iommu_free()
> on the way out of an unsuccessful probe can still manage to trip up
> concurrent accesses to a device's fwspec. Thus, extend the scope of
> iommu_probe_device_lock() to also serialise fwspec creation and initial
> retrieval.
> 
> Reported-by: Zhenhua Huang <quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/e2e20e1c-6450-4ac5-9804-b0000acdf7de@quicinc.com/

Apparently this is "Closes:" nowadays

> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index f17a1113f3d6..e0c962648dde 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -485,11 +485,12 @@ static void iommu_deinit_device(struct device *dev)
>  	dev_iommu_free(dev);
>  }
>  
> +DEFINE_MUTEX(iommu_probe_device_lock);
> +

Please put this at the top of the file with the other declarations, I
will rebase the lockdep annotations from the other series

Thanks,
Jason

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-24 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-15 18:25 [PATCH] iommu: Avoid more races around device probe Robin Murphy
2023-11-16 17:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-22 14:44   ` Greg KH
2023-11-22 19:22     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-27  9:57   ` Joerg Roedel
2023-11-20 11:26 ` André Draszik
2023-11-24 15:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231124153520.GA558245@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=andre.draszik@linaro.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.