From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F582FC21 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 15:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="eFMOWPTa" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1700840547; x=1732376547; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=rk2f9rTTzCcdlEJAvgjLk4TKr6joCWJcKPDGHFrVngs=; b=eFMOWPTadQCKUwwbv+rjqAwH2Ho13FWkgUOjTukqES8G9Nn496cPfXZC QWKSmTLmu9il5XPUH49Z2Z5SpuZ3Im66AFbXydVWI6jnhVH1oeesFb1GO ciFm6SqPqN98lQJLR9Hmd+8AbHUBLpiZO7Jw7ZJRTONrD1xiiz5gNNb9I enx6jiTdAHski0ROu8f5cKZAMxMXDpxBIeHHtP+H9klX2WWYLeVRlAHdm Ik82sKsN/sxbYX+ApzjBPnqelkkySeUfRz+wZJLhOaq0bKPYXBc3eC2cQ +99BHxQIc1OSNmHyYSbOEITaxTC3LR5g8QLoiONRCM250lekLp4PlJGAA g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10904"; a="395257437" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,224,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="395257437" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Nov 2023 07:42:25 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10904"; a="767510981" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,224,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="767510981" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d584ee6ebdcc) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2023 07:42:24 -0800 Received: from kbuild by d584ee6ebdcc with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1r6YJy-0002yY-0b; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 15:42:22 +0000 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 23:42:09 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Christoph Muellner Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] uapi: prctl: Add new prctl call to set/get the memory consistency model Message-ID: <202311242003.esZBgqBn-lkp@intel.com> References: <20231124072142.2786653-4-christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231124072142.2786653-4-christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> Hi Christoph, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on shuah-kselftest/next] [also build test WARNING on shuah-kselftest/fixes linus/master v6.7-rc2 next-20231124] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christoph-Muellner/RISC-V-Add-basic-Ssdtso-support/20231124-153009 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231124072142.2786653-4-christoph.muellner%40vrull.eu patch subject: [RFC PATCH 3/5] uapi: prctl: Add new prctl call to set/get the memory consistency model reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231124/202311242003.esZBgqBn-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311242003.esZBgqBn-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> Documentation/mm/dynamic-memory-consistency-model.rst: WARNING: document isn't included in any toctree -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki