Re: [REGRESSION]: mmap performance regression starting with k-6.1

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 03:06:44PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:52:06AM +0000, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 01:04:28AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 07:15:34AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 03:38:18PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:07:40PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > > > > > Anyway, I'm adding this regression to regzbot:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > #regzbot ^introduced: v6.0..v6.1
> > > > > 
> > > > > this is not a regression.  close it, you idiot.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > why?
> > > > 
> > > > Confused...
> > > 
> > > yes.  you're perpetually confused.  stop trying to help, you only make
> > > things worse.  learn about the things you work on, or give up.
> > 
> > Um, is this really called for?  Bagas is trying to help track
> > regressions, and if something isn't a regression like you say here, a
> > simple "This is not a regression, it's already resolved in newer
> > kernels" is fine.
> 
> Bagas has a long history of inappropriately attempting to "help" and due
> to a lack of understanding wasting peoples time.  He's not too dissimilar
> to the various wrongbots we've had over the years, including Richard B
> Johnson, Markus Elfring, etc.  I've tried to help guide him towards being
> a more productive contributor, but'have failed.  Mostly I ignore him now,
> but when he's instructing a bot to harass me, that crosses a line.

Nope, still not justification to lash out at an individual, sorry.

Please be more careful, and kind, in the future.

greg k-h