From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
RuiRui Yang <ruyang@redhat.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] LoongArch: Load vmlinux.efi to the link address
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 16:30:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231201163035.GD836278@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAhV-H7PeJWVCC8oZX_fn7XP2UYTLoOyAW4j9+3ZXMY8_R_xtg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 10:54:49PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Simon,
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:06 PM Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 12:15:17PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > > Hi, all,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 2:27 PM WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:36 AM RuiRui Yang <ruyang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 09:53, RuiRui Yang <ruyang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 at 14:54, WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Currently, kexec loads vmlinux.efi to address 0 instead of the link
> > > > > > > address. This causes kexec to fail to boot the new vmlinux.efi on qemu.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > pei_loongarch_load: kernel_segment: 0000000000000000
> > > > > > > pei_loongarch_load: kernel_entry: 00000000013f1000
> > > > > > > pei_loongarch_load: image_size: 0000000001ca0000
> > > > > > > pei_loongarch_load: text_offset: 0000000000200000
> > > > > > > pei_loongarch_load: phys_offset: 0000000000000000
> > > > > > > pei_loongarch_load: PE format: yes
> > > > > > > loongarch_load_other_segments:333: command_line: kexec console=ttyS0,115200
> > > > > > > kexec_load: entry = 0x13f1000 flags = 0x1020000
> > > > > > > nr_segments = 2
> > > > > > > segment[0].buf = 0x7fffeea38010
> > > > > > > segment[0].bufsz = 0x1b55200
> > > > > > > segment[0].mem = (nil)
> > > > > > > segment[0].memsz = 0x1ca0000
> > > > > > > segment[1].buf = 0x5555570940b0
> > > > > > > segment[1].bufsz = 0x200
> > > > > > > segment[1].mem = 0x1ca0000
> > > > > > > segment[1].memsz = 0x4000
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This patch constrains the range of the kernel segment by `hole_min`
> > > > > > > and `hole_max` to place vmlinux.efi exactly at the link address.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > pei_loongarch_load: kernel_segment: 0000000000200000
> > > > > > > pei_loongarch_load: kernel_entry: 00000000013f1000
> > > > > > > pei_loongarch_load: image_size: 0000000001ca0000
> > > > > > > pei_loongarch_load: text_offset: 0000000000200000
> > > > > > > pei_loongarch_load: phys_offset: 0000000000000000
> > > > > > > pei_loongarch_load: PE format: yes
> > > > > > > loongarch_load_other_segments:339: command_line: kexec console=ttyS0,115200
> > > > > > > kexec_load: entry = 0x13f1000 flags = 0x1020000
> > > > > > > nr_segments = 2
> > > > > > > segment[0].buf = 0x7ffff2028010
> > > > > > > segment[0].bufsz = 0x1b55200
> > > > > > > segment[0].mem = 0x200000
> > > > > > > segment[0].memsz = 0x1ca0000
> > > > > > > segment[1].buf = 0x555557498098
> > > > > > > segment[1].bufsz = 0x200
> > > > > > > segment[1].mem = 0x1ea0000
> > > > > > > segment[1].memsz = 0x4000
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > v1->v2:
> > > > > > > * Fix the issue preventing it from working on the physical machine.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > kexec/arch/loongarch/kexec-loongarch.c | 10 +++++++---
> > > > > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/kexec/arch/loongarch/kexec-loongarch.c b/kexec/arch/loongarch/kexec-loongarch.c
> > > > > > > index 62ff8fd..32a42d2 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/kexec/arch/loongarch/kexec-loongarch.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/kexec/arch/loongarch/kexec-loongarch.c
> > > > > > > @@ -265,9 +265,13 @@ unsigned long loongarch_locate_kernel_segment(struct kexec_info *info)
> > > > > > > hole = ULONG_MAX;
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > } else {
> > > > > > > - hole = locate_hole(info,
> > > > > > > - loongarch_mem.text_offset + loongarch_mem.image_size,
> > > > > > > - MiB(1), 0, ULONG_MAX, 1);
> > > > > > > + unsigned long hole_min;
> > > > > > > + unsigned long hole_max;
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + hole_min = loongarch_mem.text_offset;
> > > > > > > + hole_max = hole_min + loongarch_mem.image_size;
> > > > > > > + hole = locate_hole(info, loongarch_mem.image_size,
> > > > > > > + MiB(1), hole_min, hole_max, 1);
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > if (hole == ULONG_MAX)
> > > > > > > dbgprintf("%s: locate_hole failed\n", __func__);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Previously when I played with the zboot kernel on a kvm guest I
> > > > > > noticed this issue, but I found that the 1st 2M memory is memblock
> > > > > > reserved but it is not shown in /proc/iomem as reserved, I suspect the
> > > > > > 1st 2M is not usable for some arch specific reason but I was not sure.
> > > > > > Below patch can fix it but due to my rusty knowledge of loongarch I
> > > > >
> > > > > Correct about my English wording a bit, I meant about rusty knowledge
> > > > > of kexec details and newbish loongarch knowledge,
> > > > > BTW, the webmail often randomly choose the sender email, I usually use
> > > > > another email for community, that is Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
> > > > > same person ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway, since this is loongarch specific, it would be better to leave
> > > > > you guys the arch people to see how to fix it better.
> > > > >
> > > > > > did not send it out. I suspect even if the locate_hole avoids the
> > > > > > wrong memory, in the 2nd kernel it could still access it. Correct?
> > > >
> > > > I can confirm that the mapping of the 1st 2M in iomem on qemu causes
> > > > kexec to not work. The root cause is that LoongArch's vmlinux.efi can
> > > > only run on the link address, which is why I limit the allocation
> > > > location of the kernel segment through hole min/max, not the kernel's
> > > > iomem.
> > > >
> > > > Hucai, what do you think about the 1st 2M mapping type in the kernel?
> > > I agree with WANG Rui, this should be fixed in kexec-tools, and
> > > 'nomap' is not for such a usage.
> >
> > Can I confirm that you'd still like this patch applied?
> Yes, v1 breaks the real machine, while v2 works on both real machine and qemu.
Thanks, applied.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-01 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-25 6:52 [PATCH v2] LoongArch: Load vmlinux.efi to the link address WANG Rui
2023-11-26 3:28 ` Huacai Chen
2023-11-27 1:53 ` RuiRui Yang
2023-11-27 2:36 ` RuiRui Yang
2023-11-28 6:29 ` WANG Rui
2023-11-29 4:15 ` Huacai Chen
2023-12-01 14:06 ` Simon Horman
2023-12-01 14:54 ` Huacai Chen
2023-12-01 16:30 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-11-28 7:07 ` hev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231201163035.GD836278@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ruyang@redhat.com \
--cc=wangrui@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.