From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DFE42E847 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2023 19:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OFTCFd9Q" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78C9BC433C8; Mon, 4 Dec 2023 19:06:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1701716794; bh=uYS9kHXH5AlsD/GOAW97auDQUluu3tWNnU6N4o8x+qY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OFTCFd9QeWLveVtY2PpT4gKqLLh8t9bgUshTTFrI00WUzOb4FKlfqswxyM09NQgZa iVVpZN5eDQpqpqxWpaHnFTnBnkfbzjeV71IZAIS/Y8Rfr0R+h2+3MwigzcJ1bx5ven pXRqOujBWabektgOs0izJQXCu5jZlV2wT7wLOQiYHbRIfuD/EGsoGog1OElDga1fGi sXI4jhVD0OHuHXry7FuB4i5M3GpJWg+rHEVNBt7uL69o7Rd8G2/G8zJB8aLPX/Tl6U STrfzOfT16iE7e4qZgGxCnyMVvIil3zs3Qb5/hQOGmR2ofB1Q5qNkrga0Alqoa2bb6 KNfbULps6j87g== Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:06:32 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Neal Cardwell Cc: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Coco Li , edumazet@google.com, mubashirq@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew@lunn.ch, corbet@lwn.net, dsahern@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, wwchao@google.com, weiwan@google.com, pnemavat@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 0/5] Analyze and Reorganize core Networking Structs to optimize cacheline consumption Message-ID: <20231204110632.7f8cb41f@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20231129072756.3684495-1-lixiaoyan@google.com> <170155622408.27182.16031150060782175153.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 17:36:10 -0500 Neal Cardwell wrote: > Both from this email and the git logs it looks like the last two > commits didn't make it in? Is that intentional? :-) Trying to apply them now - it looks like there's a conflict. Coco - could you respin just the last two?