From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<martin.lau@kernel.org>
Cc: <andrii@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@meta.com>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/10] selftests/bpf: add stack access precision test
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:25:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231204192601.2672497-3-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231204192601.2672497-1-andrii@kernel.org>
Add a new selftests that validates precision tracking for stack access
instruction, using both r10-based and non-r10-based accesses. For
non-r10 ones we also make sure to have non-zero var_off to validate that
final stack offset is tracked properly in instruction history
information inside verifier.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
.../bpf/progs/verifier_subprog_precision.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_subprog_precision.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_subprog_precision.c
index eba98fab2f54..6f5d19665cf6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_subprog_precision.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_subprog_precision.c
@@ -641,14 +641,68 @@ __naked int subprog_spill_into_parent_stack_slot_precise(void)
);
}
-__naked __noinline __used
-static __u64 subprog_with_checkpoint(void)
+SEC("?raw_tp")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__msg("17: (0f) r1 += r0")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 17 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 16: (bf) r1 = r7")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 15: (27) r0 *= 4")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 14: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16)")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-16 before 13: (7b) *(u64 *)(r7 -8) = r0")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 12: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r8 +16)")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-16 before 11: (7b) *(u64 *)(r8 +16) = r0")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 10: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r7 -8)")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-16 before 9: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r0")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 8: (07) r8 += -32")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 7: (bf) r8 = r10")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 6: (07) r7 += -8")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 5: (bf) r7 = r10")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 21: (95) exit")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame1: regs=r0 stack= before 20: (bf) r0 = r1")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame1: regs=r1 stack= before 4: (85) call pc+15")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r1 stack= before 3: (bf) r1 = r6")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r6 stack= before 2: (b7) r6 = 1")
+__naked int stack_slot_aliases_precision(void)
{
asm volatile (
- "r0 = 0;"
- /* guaranteed checkpoint if BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ is used */
- "goto +0;"
+ "r6 = 1;"
+ /* pass r6 through r1 into subprog to get it back as r0;
+ * this whole chain will have to be marked as precise later
+ */
+ "r1 = r6;"
+ "call identity_subprog;"
+ /* let's setup two registers that are aliased to r10 */
+ "r7 = r10;"
+ "r7 += -8;" /* r7 = r10 - 8 */
+ "r8 = r10;"
+ "r8 += -32;" /* r8 = r10 - 32 */
+ /* now spill subprog's return value (a r6 -> r1 -> r0 chain)
+ * a few times through different stack pointer regs, making
+ * sure to use r10, r7, and r8 both in LDX and STX insns, and
+ * *importantly* also using a combination of const var_off and
+ * insn->off to validate that we record final stack slot
+ * correctly, instead of relying on just insn->off derivation,
+ * which is only valid for r10-based stack offset
+ */
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r0;"
+ "r0 = *(u64 *)(r7 - 8);" /* r7 - 8 == r10 - 16 */
+ "*(u64 *)(r8 + 16) = r0;" /* r8 + 16 = r10 - 16 */
+ "r0 = *(u64 *)(r8 + 16);"
+ "*(u64 *)(r7 - 8) = r0;"
+ "r0 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ /* get ready to use r0 as an index into array to force precision */
+ "r0 *= 4;"
+ "r1 = %[vals];"
+ /* here r0->r1->r6 chain is forced to be precise and has to be
+ * propagated back to the beginning, including through the
+ * subprog call and all the stack spills and loads
+ */
+ "r1 += r0;"
+ "r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0);"
"exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_ptr(vals)
+ : __clobber_common, "r6"
);
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-04 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-04 19:25 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/10] Complete BPF verifier precision tracking support for register spills Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 19:25 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/10] bpf: support non-r10 register spill/fill to/from stack in precision tracking Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 19:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2023-12-04 19:25 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 03/10] bpf: fix check for attempt to corrupt spilled pointer Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 22:12 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-04 22:15 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-05 0:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 0:54 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-05 3:56 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 13:34 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-05 18:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 18:49 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-12-05 18:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-05 1:45 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-12-05 3:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 19:25 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/10] bpf: preserve STACK_ZERO slots on partial reg spills Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 19:25 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/10] selftests/bpf: validate STACK_ZERO is preserved on subreg spill Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 19:25 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 06/10] bpf: preserve constant zero when doing partial register restore Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 19:25 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 07/10] selftests/bpf: validate zero preservation for sub-slot loads Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 19:25 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/10] bpf: track aligned STACK_ZERO cases as imprecise spilled registers Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 09/10] selftests/bpf: validate precision logic in partial_stack_load_preserves_zeros Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 10/10] bpf: use common instruction history across all states Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 22:32 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/10] Complete BPF verifier precision tracking support for register spills Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-04 23:02 ` Yonghong Song
2023-12-04 23:52 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231204192601.2672497-3-andrii@kernel.org \
--to=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.