From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA3EC39FC4 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2023 23:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="E5YgMFaZ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1701733788; x=1733269788; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=xPuJGtyYnnFG3ZlF6+RQ+Vcb+8rsl8GcaRCuSHoE3S8=; b=E5YgMFaZ12IgT2geY+MuNJPEWHzoVGyNX7Ge4aO8uo98Ok6IsEPxA+TI tSRFYJbQznyZ1eqcz0UAIxQDh+1tP2iI8z6enDnB2Sy3MDXFEvlCldsfT ZiG7+wPLlaPtEwa4dEv0zou/kFiqERqxotdhrEW45gO7ImYUL70jhkZSl 9R1AeL92mzaQOIEKS0IQS6FYCwJ8R6V4pN60+nInKTw+AO0ilKkarij1J 8yhETSGZLF1emSFXRoLFpxfY6cXYiTubybsNOhHeSNKCQkS/3hHLQAvhO nyGwKSrnEBZGdjk1JkIh/+aA1tFgu3NgM9KE53RvOO3V3ZusTb7Zim+LH Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10914"; a="458137658" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,251,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="458137658" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Dec 2023 15:49:44 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10914"; a="861552918" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,251,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="861552918" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b07ab15da5fe) ([10.239.97.151]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2023 15:49:43 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b07ab15da5fe with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rAIh2-0008Ba-1m; Mon, 04 Dec 2023 23:49:40 +0000 Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 07:48:58 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Kalesh Singh Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Fuad Tabba Subject: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c:10:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_overflow_stack' was not declared. Should it be static? Message-ID: <202312050737.W2Tcdbew-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master head: bee0e7762ad2c6025b9f5245c040fcc36ef2bde8 commit: 548ec3336f323db56260b312c232ab37285f0284 KVM: arm64: On stack overflow switch to hyp overflow_stack date: 1 year, 4 months ago config: arm64-randconfig-r112-20231117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231205/202312050737.W2Tcdbew-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231205/202312050737.W2Tcdbew-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312050737.W2Tcdbew-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c:10:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_overflow_stack' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/__pcpu_scope_overflow_stack +10 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c 9 > 10 DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE/sizeof(long)], overflow_stack) -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki