From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8797E675D0 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 16:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="T9Xm7JqB" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1701794212; x=1733330212; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=rLhXiVPRaWgKxljFAmM6MuNRPX02UeTnMcvFS7Ut1tc=; b=T9Xm7JqBNVv5yYvLnM01HLaa1mfA8v0U4bqOdxJh19jEjB9U6u9x1cOj ltXP3vC4WMZNv0hoGGg4MwF9yhnM6b+mThAXltYZFu2blO7f/Qx46klzw pAmgsGXeufEDOGe0ONU+mHcwmKIljlhCjV4P6PuNJWSJcfJPeOs4WoZss HdIcfhB84Fsg50F3r76Fx5Fjz256spV0jlssKThzza9QLjoeohnbxGsKf o6yQHBmfuvss+o+fN786TrlFZw5BZX6Z3IxlhJfL11YsSDqsWv3VJGRKl VqB5IgC4fSXVAnXYPiw93mUbkYXH2btgTSi7SrVbRk2IPLMbAjgwEdwXf g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10915"; a="374107283" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,252,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="374107283" Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Dec 2023 08:36:51 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10915"; a="774687154" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,252,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="774687154" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b07ab15da5fe) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2023 08:36:50 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b07ab15da5fe with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rAYPf-0009MO-2Z; Tue, 05 Dec 2023 16:36:47 +0000 Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 00:35:49 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Kalesh Singh Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Fuad Tabba Subject: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c:15:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_kvm_stacktrace_info' was not declared. Should it be static? Message-ID: <202312060054.ck4SZpca-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master head: bee0e7762ad2c6025b9f5245c040fcc36ef2bde8 commit: 879e5ac7b2e4db05799a905b5a07fc9e5dedf651 KVM: arm64: Prepare non-protected nVHE hypervisor stacktrace date: 1 year, 4 months ago config: arm64-randconfig-r112-20231117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231206/202312060054.ck4SZpca-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231206/202312060054.ck4SZpca-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312060054.ck4SZpca-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c:12:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_overflow_stack' was not declared. Should it be static? >> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c:15:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_kvm_stacktrace_info' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/__pcpu_scope_kvm_stacktrace_info +15 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c 11 12 DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE/sizeof(long)], overflow_stack) 13 __aligned(16); 14 > 15 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_nvhe_stacktrace_info, kvm_stacktrace_info); 16 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki