From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87A385695 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 02:26:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bbFAZVW9" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1701829579; x=1733365579; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=e51BPhpqRfhwtSoezmvbrjq5NjMJOONUAzCMVeXZ0M4=; b=bbFAZVW9lwwgbLFu+TIB2JQCN+FLo4LQgJshjwuUcphIHU9NnB/o/Rz+ BIv5tW7gHYZcAHcs0UnoALqMdPmj/OgMpL5afrb/HuxTvwTSMg5XfgAdf Tqv5J9aTjY6rgzs14EfMjdtIqfQudJw0NPIj0FTKNo9WXh6Jt250D496c q7EnR7CWFYD9Rhl1UXdtk4M52dinNfVUJq6WV//GgsTkj0KojrY4CqgJi lcDzKCtwe4sdRPBQ1/Jtz7VWdNe0rk0ytMj4bMkRyvnCPanf2B7mJFdXm /+rcemocy+IeSlyYBIWj8pdDxxy4sBZsW3/mSobtC/nor//L+ZoCqutzH A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10915"; a="384396860" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,254,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="384396860" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Dec 2023 18:26:18 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10915"; a="1018415922" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,254,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="1018415922" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b07ab15da5fe) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2023 18:26:17 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b07ab15da5fe with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rAhc6-000A5M-34; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 02:26:14 +0000 Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 10:25:27 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Anna-Maria Behnsen Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [tglx-devel:timers/pushpull 29/32] kernel/time/timer.c:2209:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'timer_base_is_idle' Message-ID: <202312061029.iAzJMftN-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Anna-Maria, FYI, the error/warning was bisected to this commit, please ignore it if it's irrelevant. tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/devel.git timers/pushpull head: c5f729902c462bd2f9153641aebe042bbb5f9ede commit: 2d179dd1eb10c4033f67686598041df429fb9382 [29/32] timers: Introduce function to check timer base is_idle flag config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-004-20231201 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231206/202312061029.iAzJMftN-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231206/202312061029.iAzJMftN-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312061029.iAzJMftN-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/time/timer.c:2209:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'timer_base_is_idle' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 2209 | bool timer_base_is_idle(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/timer_base_is_idle +2209 kernel/time/timer.c 2203 2204 /** 2205 * timer_base_is_idle() - Return whether timer base is set idle 2206 * 2207 * Returns value of local timer base is_idle value. 2208 */ > 2209 bool timer_base_is_idle(void) 2210 { 2211 return __this_cpu_read(timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL].is_idle); 2212 } 2213 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki