From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
Cc: "Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
"Maciej Żenczykowski" <zenczykowski@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 nft] parser: tcpopt: fix tcp option parsing with NUM + length field
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 13:16:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231206121653.GH8352@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d11bf95bd1b07e15cd7160ab310794ea5d4b8b0.camel@redhat.com>
Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Instead, feed the json-nft file to nft, then do a normal list-
> > ruleset,
> > then compare that vs. normal .nft file.
>
> The .nft and .json-nft files are all fed back into `nft --check -f`. So
> that is happening too.
Not really, this checks that the parser eats the input.
> It will also comparing the raw files (after sanitize+prettify), which
> is closer to the original thing that is supposed to be tested. That is
> why it's done.
"metainfo": {
- "json_schema_version": 1,
+ "version": "VERSION",
"release_name": "RELEASE_NAME",
- "version": "VERSION"
+ "json_schema_version": 1
}
},
i.e. it fails validation because the on-record file has a different
layout/ordering than what is expected.
But if you feed it into nft, nft list ruleset will generate the expected
(non-json) output.
> What issues do you mean? I don't see any. Did you test/review the two
> patches?
The first one is applied. The second one I applied locally.
But its still picky about the formatting.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-05 11:56 [PATCH v2 nft] parser: tcpopt: fix tcp option parsing with NUM + length field Florian Westphal
2023-12-05 12:07 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-12-05 12:20 ` Florian Westphal
2023-12-05 12:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-12-05 13:14 ` Florian Westphal
2023-12-05 14:10 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-12-06 7:58 ` Thomas Haller
2023-12-06 11:38 ` Florian Westphal
2023-12-06 11:50 ` Thomas Haller
2023-12-06 11:59 ` Florian Westphal
2023-12-06 12:04 ` Florian Westphal
2023-12-06 12:09 ` Thomas Haller
2023-12-06 12:16 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2023-12-06 13:22 ` Thomas Haller
2023-12-06 13:24 ` Florian Westphal
2023-12-06 14:56 ` Thomas Haller
2023-12-06 14:19 ` Phil Sutter
2023-12-06 15:12 ` Thomas Haller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231206121653.GH8352@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thaller@redhat.com \
--cc=zenczykowski@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.