From: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
To: iwd@lists.linux.dev
Cc: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 09/13] ft: add ft_handshake_setup
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 12:17:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231206201802.2139649-9-prestwoj@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231206201802.2139649-1-prestwoj@gmail.com>
This will be called from station after FT-authentication has
finished. It sets up the handshake object to perform reassociation.
This is essentially a copy-paste of ft_associate without sending
the actual frame.
---
src/ft.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/ft.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/ft.c b/src/ft.c
index d3b9234a..c612a433 100644
--- a/src/ft.c
+++ b/src/ft.c
@@ -1276,6 +1276,46 @@ int ft_associate(uint32_t ifindex, const uint8_t *addr)
return ret;
}
+int ft_handshake_setup(uint32_t ifindex, const uint8_t *target)
+{
+ struct netdev *netdev = netdev_find(ifindex);
+ struct handshake_state *hs = netdev_get_handshake(netdev);
+ struct ft_info *info;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ info = ft_info_find(ifindex, target);
+ if (!info)
+ return -ENOENT;
+
+ /*
+ * Either failed or no response. This may have been an FT-over-DS
+ * attempt so clear out the entry so FT-over-Air can try again.
+ */
+ if (info->status != 0) {
+ int status = info->status;
+
+ l_queue_remove(info_list, info);
+ ft_info_destroy(info);
+
+ return status;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * This shouldn't ever fail:
+ * - supplicant_ie has already been validated long ago
+ * - l_checksum_* shouldn't fail since we presumable have kernel
+ * support, how else could we have made it this far.
+ * But just in case...
+ */
+ if (L_WARN_ON(!ft_prepare_handshake(info, hs)))
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+
+ /* After this no previous auths will be valid */
+ ft_clear_authentications(ifindex);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static bool remove_ifindex(void *data, void *user_data)
{
struct ft_info *info = data;
diff --git a/src/ft.h b/src/ft.h
index 51bbe3bc..23d0136e 100644
--- a/src/ft.h
+++ b/src/ft.h
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ void __ft_rx_action(uint32_t ifindex, const uint8_t *frame, size_t frame_len);
void __ft_rx_authenticate(uint32_t ifindex, const uint8_t *frame,
size_t frame_len);
+int ft_handshake_setup(uint32_t ifindex, const uint8_t *target);
+
void ft_clear_authentications(uint32_t ifindex);
int ft_action(uint32_t ifindex, uint32_t freq, const struct scan_bss *target);
int ft_associate(uint32_t ifindex, const uint8_t *addr);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-06 20:17 [PATCH v3 01/13] auto-t: add explicit stop() to IWD class James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] auto-t: add association timeout test James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] auto-t: only call set_value for changed values in default() James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] handshake: add setters for authenticator/supplicant_fte James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] handshake: use authenticator_fte instead of 'fte' James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] unit: use authenticator_fte James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] handshake: remove handshake_state_set_fte James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] ft: add FTE/RSNE building to ft_prepare_handshake James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:17 ` James Prestwood [this message]
2023-12-06 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] netdev: add netdev_ft_reassociate James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] station: use netdev_ft_reassociate James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] ft: remove ft_associate and helpers James Prestwood
2023-12-06 20:18 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] netdev: station: remove NETDEV_EVENT_FT_ROAMED James Prestwood
2023-12-13 16:14 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] auto-t: add explicit stop() to IWD class Denis Kenzior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231206201802.2139649-9-prestwoj@gmail.com \
--to=prestwoj@gmail.com \
--cc=iwd@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.