From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCF7B3714E for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 13:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="LdG2iQNz" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1701867817; x=1733403817; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=p8aWlSqvz1w9cQL1KngAQJAbUWY1+vF1r7t2xrh/lmU=; b=LdG2iQNzWmupF/B+yWltgX3XchpWpEQfkKKHb+MHTFJeaXXOIgclNfFn TaNea4UGefyCgecqDc9pVeXxYsG3hnjp3JU9JNRtqL2TKyDjuhYpeeCtE X/Xrirl3pW0+044XYrmg5hgLS4pwOs1Y8NWni0KlPUXYwtJuo/bqmT0df AFvLsW7M7NnMC+Ees+CQwXRh2Q+P4KhCJqXWiy4Z6nfUwLs8Dh/yPrSMQ 7TCwh3Fb4IvHc8MS8McG6rqTiWKx1iTY2V/hmY8xxiCeBuYvLyZbJyZ45 5uSwp0vXe24oQ+jVFsRi7SVN9r2F6x9ntPXXZgeR6ggoT+KmF8cChDa3u Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10915"; a="897410" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,255,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="897410" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Dec 2023 05:03:36 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10915"; a="944648449" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,255,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="944648449" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b07ab15da5fe) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2023 05:03:31 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b07ab15da5fe with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rArYn-000AoI-0O; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 13:03:29 +0000 Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 21:03:20 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Dave Chinner Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [dgc-xfs:vfs-scale 1/11] lib/dlock-list.c:198: warning: Excess function parameter 'dlist' description in '__dlock_list_next_list' Message-ID: <202312062040.baSag4OL-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git vfs-scale head: 5e5e95a86ea3aa15d83654ec3752451959a689e6 commit: e110421085e9f39f401af6f6cbf40816751f18b2 [1/11] lib/dlock-list: Distributed and lock-protected lists config: arc-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231206/202312062040.baSag4OL-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231206/202312062040.baSag4OL-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312062040.baSag4OL-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> lib/dlock-list.c:198: warning: Excess function parameter 'dlist' description in '__dlock_list_next_list' vim +198 lib/dlock-list.c 188 189 /** 190 * __dlock_list_next_list: Find the first entry of the next available list 191 * @dlist: Pointer to the dlock_list_heads structure 192 * @iter : Pointer to the dlock list iterator structure 193 * Return: true if the entry is found, false if all the lists exhausted 194 * 195 * The information about the next available list will be put into the iterator. 196 */ 197 struct dlock_list_node *__dlock_list_next_list(struct dlock_list_iter *iter) > 198 { -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki