From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3143A1947A for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 10:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="um9XVhMk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBC34C433C8; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 10:13:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1701943992; bh=jjIqC4iSn/VFDe+Xa9h9ciWtGqh8N3pSlXrWjTTjMaI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=um9XVhMk6ydG46DAOeQvOYixYw3Lvl2SRRiPz7BFVe5hWSWwj/iBaUMibhPo8IHnp imwk05eZz98/uY/w6+KOpBNw3Ptesy6eqokQGK4kO+UoE0kWa3EmiwxEm/LoC3aKlG zxBuGQS1oGOU7Za1fr5e9R6SulbE6J6q0qaNPOzU= Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 11:13:08 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Yann Sionneau Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: regression in 6.1.yy branch: LTP test preadv03 fails Message-ID: <2023120747-domain-angled-d633@gregkh> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:05:15AM +0100, Yann Sionneau wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed yesterday that LTP test preadv03 now fails since 6.1.64 (it also > fails on 6.1.65). > > 6.6.4, 6.6.3, 6.5.0 and 6.2.0 seem to be unaffected. > > I tested this on x86_64 and kvx arch (the latter is not upstream). > > I can see some ext4 related commits on 6.1.64 and 6.1.65 changes, maybe it's > related, therefore I add ext4 mailing list as CC. > > I didn't run git bisect on this so far because I noticed building an x86_64 > ubuntu kernel on my laptop was taking ages. Maybe someone is more used to > dealing with this and can bisect this way faster than me. Should be fixed in the latest 6.1.y-rc release, right? If not, please let me know. thanks, greg k-h