From: Gang Li <gang.li@linux.dev>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com, Gang Li <gang.li@linux.dev>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] hugetlb: parallelize 2M hugetlb allocation and initialization
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 10:52:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231208025240.4744-5-gang.li@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231208025240.4744-1-gang.li@linux.dev>
By distributing both the allocation and the initialization tasks across
multiple threads, the initialization of 2M hugetlb will be faster,
thereby improving the boot speed.
This patch can achieve 60% improvement in performance.
test no patch(ms) patched(ms) saved
------------------- -------------- ------------- --------
256c2t(4 node) 2M 2624 956 63.57%
128c1t(2 node) 2M 1788 684 61.74%
Signed-off-by: Gang Li <gang.li@linux.dev>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 8de1653fc4c4f..033e359fdb86b 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#include <linux/delayacct.h>
#include <linux/memory.h>
#include <linux/mm_inline.h>
+#include <linux/padata.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
@@ -3502,6 +3503,37 @@ static void __init hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_report(unsigned long allocated, st
}
}
+static void __init hugetlb_alloc_node(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, void *arg)
+{
+ struct hstate *h = (struct hstate *)arg;
+ int i, num = end - start;
+ nodemask_t node_alloc_noretry;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /* Bit mask controlling how hard we retry per-node allocations.*/
+ nodes_clear(node_alloc_noretry);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num; ++i) {
+ struct folio *folio = alloc_pool_huge_folio(h, &node_states[N_MEMORY],
+ &node_alloc_noretry);
+ if (!folio)
+ break;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&hugetlb_lock, flags);
+ __prep_account_new_huge_page(h, folio_nid(folio));
+ enqueue_hugetlb_folio(h, folio);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hugetlb_lock, flags);
+ cond_resched();
+ }
+}
+
+static void __init hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_node(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, void *arg)
+{
+ struct hstate *h = (struct hstate *)arg;
+ int nid = start;
+
+ hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_folios(h, &h->hugepage_freelists[nid]);
+}
+
static unsigned long __init hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_gigantic(struct hstate *h)
{
unsigned long i;
@@ -3521,26 +3553,27 @@ static unsigned long __init hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_gigantic(struct hstate *h
static unsigned long __init hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_non_gigantic(struct hstate *h)
{
- unsigned long i;
- struct folio *folio;
- LIST_HEAD(folio_list);
- nodemask_t node_alloc_noretry;
-
- /* Bit mask controlling how hard we retry per-node allocations.*/
- nodes_clear(node_alloc_noretry);
-
- for (i = 0; i < h->max_huge_pages; ++i) {
- folio = alloc_pool_huge_folio(h, &node_states[N_MEMORY],
- &node_alloc_noretry);
- if (!folio)
- break;
- list_add(&folio->lru, &folio_list);
- cond_resched();
- }
-
- prep_and_add_allocated_folios(h, &folio_list);
+ struct padata_mt_job job = {
+ .fn_arg = h,
+ .align = 1,
+ .numa_aware = true,
+ };
- return i;
+ job.thread_fn = hugetlb_alloc_node,
+ job.start = 0,
+ job.size = h->max_huge_pages,
+ job.min_chunk = h->max_huge_pages / num_node_state(N_MEMORY) / 2,
+ job.max_threads = num_node_state(N_MEMORY) * 2,
+ padata_do_multithreaded(&job);
+
+ job.thread_fn = hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_node,
+ job.start = 0,
+ job.size = num_node_state(N_MEMORY),
+ job.min_chunk = 1,
+ job.max_threads = num_node_state(N_MEMORY),
+ padata_do_multithreaded(&job);
+
+ return h->nr_huge_pages;
}
/*
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-08 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-08 2:52 [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init on boot Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] hugetlb: code clean for hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] hugetlb: split hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] padata: dispatch works on different nodes Gang Li
2023-12-12 23:40 ` Tim Chen
2023-12-18 6:46 ` Gang Li
2023-12-27 10:33 ` Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:52 ` Gang Li [this message]
2023-12-08 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] hugetlb: parallelize 1G hugetlb initialization Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:56 ` [PATCH 1/1] hugetlb: add timing to hugetlb allocations on boot Gang Li
2023-12-12 20:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init " Mike Kravetz
2023-12-21 7:22 ` Gang Li
2023-12-12 22:14 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-12 23:08 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-12-13 0:10 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-18 6:34 ` Gang Li
2023-12-22 4:33 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-25 5:21 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-25 6:24 ` Gang Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231208025240.4744-5-gang.li@linux.dev \
--to=gang.li@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.