All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thinker.li@gmail.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
	drosen@google.com
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
	Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v13 08/14] bpf: hold module for bpf_struct_ops_map.
Date: Fri,  8 Dec 2023 16:27:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231209002709.535966-9-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231209002709.535966-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>

From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>

To ensure that a module remains accessible whenever a struct_ops object of
a struct_ops type provided by the module is still in use.

struct bpf_strct_ops_map doesn't hold a refcnt to btf anymore sicne a
module will hold a refcnt to it's btf already. But, struct_ops programs are
different. They hold their associated btf, not the module since they need
only btf to assure their types (signatures).

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h          |  1 +
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c  | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 10 ++++++++++
 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 91bcd62d6fcf..c5c7cc4552f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1681,6 +1681,7 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops {
 	void (*unreg)(void *kdata);
 	int (*update)(void *kdata, void *old_kdata);
 	int (*validate)(void *kdata);
+	struct module *owner;
 	const char *name;
 	struct btf_func_model func_models[BPF_STRUCT_OPS_MAX_NR_MEMBERS];
 };
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 314b679fb494..01113bcdd479 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -651,6 +651,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_env {
 	u32 prev_insn_idx;
 	struct bpf_prog *prog;		/* eBPF program being verified */
 	const struct bpf_verifier_ops *ops;
+	struct module *attach_btf_mod;	/* The owner module of prog->aux->attach_btf */
 	struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *head; /* stack of verifier states to be processed */
 	int stack_size;			/* number of states to be processed */
 	bool strict_alignment;		/* perform strict pointer alignment checks */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index f943f8378e76..a838f7c7d583 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -641,12 +641,15 @@ static void __bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 		bpf_jit_uncharge_modmem(PAGE_SIZE);
 	}
 	bpf_map_area_free(st_map->uvalue);
-	btf_put(st_map->btf);
 	bpf_map_area_free(st_map);
 }
 
 static void bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 {
+	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map = (struct bpf_struct_ops_map *)map;
+
+	module_put(st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->owner);
+
 	/* The struct_ops's function may switch to another struct_ops.
 	 *
 	 * For example, bpf_tcp_cc_x->init() may switch to
@@ -681,6 +684,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	size_t st_map_size;
 	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map;
 	const struct btf_type *t, *vt;
+	struct module *mod = NULL;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
 	struct btf *btf;
 	int ret;
@@ -690,10 +694,20 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		btf = btf_get_by_fd(attr->value_type_btf_obj_fd);
 		if (IS_ERR(btf))
 			return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(btf));
-	} else {
+
+		if (btf != btf_vmlinux) {
+			mod = btf_try_get_module(btf);
+			if (!mod) {
+				btf_put(btf);
+				return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+			}
+		}
+		/* mod (NULL for btf_vmlinux) holds a refcnt to btf. We
+		 * don't need an extra refcnt here.
+		 */
+		btf_put(btf);
+	} else
 		btf = btf_vmlinux;
-		btf_get(btf);
-	}
 
 	st_ops_desc = bpf_struct_ops_find_value(btf, attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id);
 	if (!st_ops_desc) {
@@ -756,7 +770,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 errout_free:
 	__bpf_struct_ops_map_free(map);
 errout:
-	btf_put(btf);
+	module_put(mod);
 
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
@@ -886,6 +900,10 @@ static int bpf_struct_ops_map_link_update(struct bpf_link *link, struct bpf_map
 	if (!bpf_struct_ops_valid_to_reg(new_map))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* The old map is holding the refcount for the owner module.  The
+	 * ownership of the owner module refcount is going to be
+	 * transferred from the old map to the new map.
+	 */
 	if (!st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->update)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 795c16f9cf57..c303cf2fb5ff 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -20079,6 +20079,14 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	}
 
 	btf = prog->aux->attach_btf;
+	if (btf != btf_vmlinux) {
+		/* Make sure st_ops is valid through the lifetime of env */
+		env->attach_btf_mod = btf_try_get_module(btf);
+		if (!env->attach_btf_mod) {
+			verbose(env, "owner module of btf is not found\n");
+			return -ENOTSUPP;
+		}
+	}
 
 	btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
 	st_ops_desc = bpf_struct_ops_find(btf, btf_id);
@@ -20792,6 +20800,8 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, __u3
 		env->prog->expected_attach_type = 0;
 
 	*prog = env->prog;
+
+	module_put(env->attach_btf_mod);
 err_unlock:
 	if (!is_priv)
 		mutex_unlock(&bpf_verifier_lock);
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-09  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-09  0:26 [PATCH bpf-next v13 00/14] Registrating struct_ops types from modules thinker.li
2023-12-09  0:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 01/14] bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function thinker.li
2023-12-09  0:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 02/14] bpf: get type information with BPF_ID_LIST thinker.li
2023-12-15  1:59   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-09  0:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 03/14] bpf, net: introduce bpf_struct_ops_desc thinker.li
2023-12-15  2:05   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-09  0:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 04/14] bpf: add struct_ops_tab to btf thinker.li
2023-12-15  2:22   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-15 21:42     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-16  1:19       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-16  5:43         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-16 16:48           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-17  7:09             ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-09  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 05/14] bpf: make struct_ops_map support btfs other than btf_vmlinux thinker.li
2023-12-09  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 06/14] bpf: lookup struct_ops types from a given module BTF thinker.li
2023-12-09  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 07/14] bpf: pass attached BTF to the bpf_struct_ops subsystem thinker.li
2023-12-15  2:44   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-15 22:10     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-16  0:19       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-16  5:55         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-16  6:07           ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-16 16:41             ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-16 19:38               ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-09  0:27 ` thinker.li [this message]
2023-12-15  5:54   ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 08/14] bpf: hold module for bpf_struct_ops_map Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-15 23:25     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-09  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 09/14] bpf: validate value_type thinker.li
2023-12-15  6:02   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-15 23:52     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-09  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 10/14] bpf, net: switch to dynamic registration thinker.li
2023-12-15  6:51   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-09  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 11/14] libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs thinker.li
2023-12-09  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 12/14] bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules thinker.li
2023-12-09  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 13/14] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops() thinker.li
2023-12-15  7:17   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-17  7:32     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-09  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 14/14] bpf: pass btf object id in bpf_map_info thinker.li
2023-12-15  7:46   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-17  7:35     ` Kui-Feng Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231209002709.535966-9-thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drosen@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.