All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@gmail.com>,
	Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/14] tracing: Update snapshot order along with main buffer order
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 22:54:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231210040450.846348590@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20231210035404.053677508@goodmis.org

From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

When updating the order of the sub buffers for the main buffer, make sure
that if the snapshot buffer exists, that it gets its order updated as
well.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index b3b36d7f1201..7faaaf29b504 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -1263,10 +1263,17 @@ static void set_buffer_entries(struct array_buffer *buf, unsigned long val);
 
 int tracing_alloc_snapshot_instance(struct trace_array *tr)
 {
+	int order;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!tr->allocated_snapshot) {
 
+		/* Make the snapshot buffer have the same order as main buffer */
+		order = ring_buffer_subbuf_order_get(tr->array_buffer.buffer);
+		ret = ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(tr->max_buffer.buffer, order);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+
 		/* allocate spare buffer */
 		ret = resize_buffer_duplicate_size(&tr->max_buffer,
 				   &tr->array_buffer, RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS);
@@ -1286,6 +1293,7 @@ static void free_snapshot(struct trace_array *tr)
 	 * The max_tr ring buffer has some state (e.g. ring->clock) and
 	 * we want preserve it.
 	 */
+	ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(tr->max_buffer.buffer, 0);
 	ring_buffer_resize(tr->max_buffer.buffer, 1, RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS);
 	set_buffer_entries(&tr->max_buffer, 1);
 	tracing_reset_online_cpus(&tr->max_buffer);
@@ -9378,6 +9386,7 @@ buffer_order_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
 {
 	struct trace_array *tr = filp->private_data;
 	unsigned long val;
+	int old_order;
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = kstrtoul_from_user(ubuf, cnt, 10, &val);
@@ -9388,12 +9397,44 @@ buffer_order_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
 	if (val < 0 || val > 7)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	old_order = ring_buffer_subbuf_order_get(tr->array_buffer.buffer);
+	if (old_order == val)
+		return 0;
+
 	ret = ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(tr->array_buffer.buffer, val);
 	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+		return 0;
 
-	(*ppos)++;
+#ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE
 
+	if (!tr->allocated_snapshot)
+		goto out_max;
+
+	ret = ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(tr->max_buffer.buffer, val);
+	if (ret) {
+		/* Put back the old order */
+		cnt = ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(tr->array_buffer.buffer, old_order);
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cnt)) {
+			/*
+			 * AARGH! We are left with different orders!
+			 * The max buffer is our "snapshot" buffer.
+			 * When a tracer needs a snapshot (one of the
+			 * latency tracers), it swaps the max buffer
+			 * with the saved snap shot. We succeeded to
+			 * update the order of the main buffer, but failed to
+			 * update the order of the max buffer. But when we tried
+			 * to reset the main buffer to the original size, we
+			 * failed there too. This is very unlikely to
+			 * happen, but if it does, warn and kill all
+			 * tracing.
+			 */
+			tracing_disabled = 1;
+		}
+		return ret;
+	}
+ out_max:
+#endif
+	(*ppos)++;
 	return cnt;
 }
 
-- 
2.42.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-10  4:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-10  3:54 [PATCH 00/14] ring-buffer/tracing: Allow ring buffer to have bigger sub buffers Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10  3:54 ` [PATCH 01/14] ring-buffer: Refactor ring buffer implementation Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10  3:54 ` [PATCH 02/14] ring-buffer: Page size per ring buffer Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10  3:54 ` [PATCH 03/14] ring-buffer: Add interface for configuring trace sub buffer size Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10  3:54 ` [PATCH 04/14] ring-buffer: Set new size of the ring buffer sub page Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10  3:54 ` [PATCH 05/14] ring-buffer: Read and write to ring buffers with custom sub buffer size Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10  3:54 ` [PATCH 06/14] ring-buffer: Clear pages on error in ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set() failure Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10  3:54 ` [PATCH 07/14] ring-buffer: Do no swap cpu buffers if order is different Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10  3:54 ` [PATCH 08/14] ring-buffer: Make sure the spare sub buffer used for reads has same size Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10  3:54 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2023-12-10  3:54 ` [PATCH 10/14] tracing: Stop the tracing while changing the ring buffer subbuf size Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10  3:54 ` [PATCH 11/14] ring-buffer: Keep the same size when updating the order Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10  3:54 ` [PATCH 12/14] ring-buffer: Just update the subbuffers when changing their allocation order Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10  3:54 ` [PATCH 13/14] ring-buffer: Add documentation on the buffer_subbuf_order file Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10 14:28   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-12-10  3:54 ` [PATCH 14/14] ringbuffer/selftest: Add basic selftest to test chaning subbuf order Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10 14:26   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-12-10 15:44     ` Steven Rostedt
2023-12-10 14:17 ` [PATCH 00/14] ring-buffer/tracing: Allow ring buffer to have bigger sub buffers Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-12-10 15:38   ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231210040450.846348590@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=tz.stoyanov@gmail.com \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.