All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@sberdevices.ru, oxffffaa@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 0/4] send credit update during setting SO_RCVLOWAT
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:12:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231212111131-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d27f22f0-0f1e-e1bb-5b13-a524dc6e94d7@salutedevices.com>

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 06:59:03PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12.12.2023 18:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 12:16:54AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>                                DESCRIPTION
> >>
> >> This patchset fixes old problem with hungup of both rx/tx sides and adds
> >> test for it. This happens due to non-default SO_RCVLOWAT value and
> >> deferred credit update in virtio/vsock. Link to previous old patchset:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/39b2e9fd-601b-189d-39a9-914e5574524c@sberdevices.ru/
> > 
> > 
> > Patchset:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > 
> > 
> > But I worry whether we actually need 3/8 in net not in net-next.
> 
> Because of "Fixes" tag ? I think this problem is not critical and reproducible
> only in special cases, but i'm not familiar with netdev process so good, so I don't
> have strong opinion. I guess @Stefano knows better.
> 
> Thanks, Arseniy

Fixes means "if you have that other commit then you need this commit
too". I think as a minimum you need to rearrange patches to make the
fix go in first. We don't want a regression followed by a fix.

> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> >> Here is what happens step by step:
> >>
> >>                                   TEST
> >>
> >>                             INITIAL CONDITIONS
> >>
> >> 1) Vsock buffer size is 128KB.
> >> 2) Maximum packet size is also 64KB as defined in header (yes it is
> >>    hardcoded, just to remind about that value).
> >> 3) SO_RCVLOWAT is default, e.g. 1 byte.
> >>
> >>
> >>                                  STEPS
> >>
> >>             SENDER                              RECEIVER
> >> 1) sends 128KB + 1 byte in a
> >>    single buffer. 128KB will
> >>    be sent, but for 1 byte
> >>    sender will wait for free
> >>    space at peer. Sender goes
> >>    to sleep.
> >>
> >>
> >> 2)                                     reads 64KB, credit update not sent
> >> 3)                                     sets SO_RCVLOWAT to 64KB + 1
> >> 4)                                     poll() -> wait forever, there is
> >>                                        only 64KB available to read.
> >>
> >> So in step 4) receiver also goes to sleep, waiting for enough data or
> >> connection shutdown message from the sender. Idea to fix it is that rx
> >> kicks tx side to continue transmission (and may be close connection)
> >> when rx changes number of bytes to be woken up (e.g. SO_RCVLOWAT) and
> >> this value is bigger than number of available bytes to read.
> >>
> >> I've added small test for this, but not sure as it uses hardcoded value
> >> for maximum packet length, this value is defined in kernel header and
> >> used to control deferred credit update. And as this is not available to
> >> userspace, I can't control test parameters correctly (if one day this
> >> define will be changed - test may become useless). 
> >>
> >> Head for this patchset is:
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=021b0c952f226236f2edf89c737efb9a28d1422d
> >>
> >> Link to v1:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231108072004.1045669-1-avkrasnov@salutedevices.com/
> >> Link to v2:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231119204922.2251912-1-avkrasnov@salutedevices.com/
> >> Link to v3:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231122180510.2297075-1-avkrasnov@salutedevices.com/
> >> Link to v4:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231129212519.2938875-1-avkrasnov@salutedevices.com/
> >> Link to v5:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231130130840.253733-1-avkrasnov@salutedevices.com/
> >> Link to v6:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231205064806.2851305-1-avkrasnov@salutedevices.com/
> >> Link to v7:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231206211849.2707151-1-avkrasnov@salutedevices.com/
> >>
> >> Changelog:
> >> v1 -> v2:
> >>  * Patchset rebased and tested on new HEAD of net-next (see hash above).
> >>  * New patch is added as 0001 - it removes return from SO_RCVLOWAT set
> >>    callback in 'af_vsock.c' when transport callback is set - with that
> >>    we can set 'sk_rcvlowat' only once in 'af_vsock.c' and in future do
> >>    not copy-paste it to every transport. It was discussed in v1.
> >>  * See per-patch changelog after ---.
> >> v2 -> v3:
> >>  * See changelog after --- in 0003 only (0001 and 0002 still same).
> >> v3 -> v4:
> >>  * Patchset rebased and tested on new HEAD of net-next (see hash above).
> >>  * See per-patch changelog after ---.
> >> v4 -> v5:
> >>  * Change patchset tag 'RFC' -> 'net-next'.
> >>  * See per-patch changelog after ---.
> >> v5 -> v6:
> >>  * New patch 0003 which sends credit update during reading bytes from
> >>    socket.
> >>  * See per-patch changelog after ---.
> >> v6 -> v7:
> >>  * Patchset rebased and tested on new HEAD of net-next (see hash above).
> >>  * See per-patch changelog after ---.
> >> v7 -> v8:
> >>  * See per-patch changelog after ---.
> >>
> >> Arseniy Krasnov (4):
> >>   vsock: update SO_RCVLOWAT setting callback
> >>   virtio/vsock: send credit update during setting SO_RCVLOWAT
> >>   virtio/vsock: fix logic which reduces credit update messages
> >>   vsock/test: two tests to check credit update logic
> >>
> >>  drivers/vhost/vsock.c                   |   1 +
> >>  include/linux/virtio_vsock.h            |   1 +
> >>  include/net/af_vsock.h                  |   2 +-
> >>  net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c                |   9 +-
> >>  net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c        |   4 +-
> >>  net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c        |   1 +
> >>  net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c |  43 +++++-
> >>  net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c          |   1 +
> >>  tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c        | 175 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  9 files changed, 229 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> 2.25.1
> > 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-12 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-11 21:16 [PATCH net-next v8 0/4] send credit update during setting SO_RCVLOWAT Arseniy Krasnov
2023-12-11 21:16 ` [PATCH net-next v8 1/4] vsock: update SO_RCVLOWAT setting callback Arseniy Krasnov
2023-12-11 21:16 ` [PATCH net-next v8 2/4] virtio/vsock: send credit update during setting SO_RCVLOWAT Arseniy Krasnov
2023-12-11 21:16 ` [PATCH net-next v8 3/4] virtio/vsock: fix logic which reduces credit update messages Arseniy Krasnov
2023-12-12  8:56   ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-12-12 15:54   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-12 15:50     ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-12-12 16:11       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-12 17:41         ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-12-11 21:16 ` [PATCH net-next v8 4/4] vsock/test: two tests to check credit update logic Arseniy Krasnov
2023-12-12 15:54 ` [PATCH net-next v8 0/4] send credit update during setting SO_RCVLOWAT Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-12 15:59   ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-12-12 16:12     ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-12-12 17:43       ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-12-13  8:43         ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-12-13  9:08           ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-12-13  9:41             ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-12-13 10:08               ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-12-13 15:05             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-13 15:13               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-13 17:11                 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-12-13 17:56                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-14  8:45                   ` Stefano Garzarella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231212111131-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=avkrasnov@salutedevices.com \
    --cc=bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oxffffaa@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.