All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	<martin.lau@kernel.org>
Cc: <andrii@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 10/10] selftests/bpf: add tests for LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH envvar
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:08:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231213190842.3844987-11-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231213190842.3844987-1-andrii@kernel.org>

Add new subtest validating LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH envvar semantics.
Extend existing test to validate that LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH allows to
disable implicit BPF token creation by setting envvar to empty string.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c  | 112 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c
index 1a3c3aacf537..548aeb91ab0d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c
@@ -769,6 +769,9 @@ static int userns_obj_priv_btf_success(int mnt_fd)
 	return validate_struct_ops_load(mnt_fd, true /* should succeed */);
 }
 
+#define TOKEN_ENVVAR "LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH"
+#define TOKEN_BPFFS_CUSTOM "/bpf-token-fs"
+
 static int userns_obj_priv_implicit_token(int mnt_fd)
 {
 	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
@@ -791,6 +794,20 @@ static int userns_obj_priv_implicit_token(int mnt_fd)
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "move_mount_bpffs"))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* disable implicit BPF token creation by setting
+	 * LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH envvar to empty value, load should fail
+	 */
+	err = setenv(TOKEN_ENVVAR, "", 1 /*overwrite*/);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "setenv_token_path"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel, "obj_token_envvar_disabled_load")) {
+		unsetenv(TOKEN_ENVVAR);
+		dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	unsetenv(TOKEN_ENVVAR);
+
 	/* now the same struct_ops skeleton should succeed thanks to libppf
 	 * creating BPF token from /sys/fs/bpf mount point
 	 */
@@ -826,6 +843,90 @@ static int userns_obj_priv_implicit_token(int mnt_fd)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int userns_obj_priv_implicit_token_envvar(int mnt_fd)
+{
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
+	struct dummy_st_ops_success *skel;
+	int err;
+
+	/* before we mount BPF FS with token delegation, struct_ops skeleton
+	 * should fail to load
+	 */
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel, "obj_tokenless_load")) {
+		dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	/* mount custom BPF FS over custom location, so libbpf can't create
+	 * BPF token implicitly, unless pointed to it through
+	 * LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH envvar
+	 */
+	rmdir(TOKEN_BPFFS_CUSTOM);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(mkdir(TOKEN_BPFFS_CUSTOM, 0777), "mkdir_bpffs_custom"))
+		goto err_out;
+	err = sys_move_mount(mnt_fd, "", AT_FDCWD, TOKEN_BPFFS_CUSTOM, MOVE_MOUNT_F_EMPTY_PATH);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "move_mount_bpffs"))
+		goto err_out;
+
+	/* even though we have BPF FS with delegation, it's not at default
+	 * /sys/fs/bpf location, so we still fail to load until envvar is set up
+	 */
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel, "obj_tokenless_load2")) {
+		dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
+		goto err_out;
+	}
+
+	err = setenv(TOKEN_ENVVAR, TOKEN_BPFFS_CUSTOM, 1 /*overwrite*/);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "setenv_token_path"))
+		goto err_out;
+
+	/* now the same struct_ops skeleton should succeed thanks to libppf
+	 * creating BPF token from custom mount point
+	 */
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "obj_implicit_token_load"))
+		goto err_out;
+
+	dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
+
+	/* now disable implicit token through empty bpf_token_path, envvar
+	 * will be ignored, should fail
+	 */
+	opts.bpf_token_path = "";
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_opts(&opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "obj_empty_token_path_open"))
+		goto err_out;
+
+	err = dummy_st_ops_success__load(skel);
+	dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "obj_empty_token_path_load"))
+		goto err_out;
+
+	/* now disable implicit token through negative bpf_token_fd, envvar
+	 * will be ignored, should fail
+	 */
+	opts.bpf_token_path = NULL;
+	opts.bpf_token_fd = -1;
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_opts(&opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "obj_neg_token_fd_open"))
+		goto err_out;
+
+	err = dummy_st_ops_success__load(skel);
+	dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "obj_neg_token_fd_load"))
+		goto err_out;
+
+	rmdir(TOKEN_BPFFS_CUSTOM);
+	unsetenv(TOKEN_ENVVAR);
+	return 0;
+err_out:
+	rmdir(TOKEN_BPFFS_CUSTOM);
+	unsetenv(TOKEN_ENVVAR);
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
 #define bit(n) (1ULL << (n))
 
 void test_token(void)
@@ -904,4 +1005,15 @@ void test_token(void)
 
 		subtest_userns(&opts, userns_obj_priv_implicit_token);
 	}
+	if (test__start_subtest("obj_priv_implicit_token_envvar")) {
+		struct bpffs_opts opts = {
+			/* allow BTF loading */
+			.cmds = bit(BPF_BTF_LOAD) | bit(BPF_MAP_CREATE) | bit(BPF_PROG_LOAD),
+			.maps = bit(BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS),
+			.progs = bit(BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS),
+			.attachs = ~0ULL,
+		};
+
+		subtest_userns(&opts, userns_obj_priv_implicit_token_envvar);
+	}
 }
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-13 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-13 19:08 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/10] BPF token support in libbpf's BPF object Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/10] bpf: fail BPF_TOKEN_CREATE if no delegation option was set on BPF FS Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/10] libbpf: split feature detectors definitions from cached results Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 03/10] libbpf: further decouple feature checking logic from bpf_object Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/10] libbpf: move feature detection code into its own file Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/10] libbpf: wire up token_fd into feature probing logic Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 06/10] libbpf: wire up BPF token support at BPF object level Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 07/10] selftests/bpf: add BPF object loading tests with explicit token passing Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/10] selftests/bpf: add tests for BPF object load with implicit token Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 09/10] libbpf: support BPF token path setting through LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH envvar Andrii Nakryiko
2023-12-13 19:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2023-12-14  0:00 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/10] BPF token support in libbpf's BPF object patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-12-14  0:45 ` John Fastabend

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231213190842.3844987-11-andrii@kernel.org \
    --to=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.