From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54107C4332F for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 07:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB2E83A93; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 07:41:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org DDB2E83A93 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hCEM67lpiomZ; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 07:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3668F83BD5; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 07:41:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 3668F83BD5 Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D893F1BF28E for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 07:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74EE42036 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 07:41:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org A74EE42036 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Avv-Wk0qFs1R for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 07:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::222]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45E4F42029 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 07:41:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 45E4F42029 Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E50E740006; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 07:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:41:16 +0100 To: "Frager, Neal" Message-ID: <20231214084116.48e04ecf@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <5EB6E748-BA27-414C-9AB0-434429B724BF@amd.com> References: <20231204073443.1543587-1-neal.frager@amd.com> <20231213232854.5242117f@windsurf> <5EB6E748-BA27-414C-9AB0-434429B724BF@amd.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1702539678; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BNclw0BCmQK322TN8LSa60wViXnXfuUQQziuxYFGWz0=; b=G7Mvv3pFpDNkFbqYqrFGElbrzP3sR5RxLlfd28JeLEIcStysW8BzkLBQ8HwYzSiyh/Woh7 nK8Wds+YDWv/aKaP3tq/OImWi7+lK0u09Wjt7CsueSp8Ui9/NrHY6p+4+B7YOejuATH1mv wGBlLnDh5XoaREhLk6wSiJM+8UFDe4+15GWaGxZauCVEf3iIwWHIh6KKMPKFH4W2DaG9Fl 6rqyv7/Yq8L+WbHQcYI/SrV1AxwhLYQCs+uMjDrJOgwRYkVxlIiR0jBEEsB4YFcnEr0nbZ zBKbDaEkMcA9Xv7WSE1K2w6zLsbMdc3ETNVoN6hTzsADLgPkcFYNFviMWBDaLQ== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=G7Mvv3pF Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v8 01/10] package/binutils-bare-metal: new package X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: "Simek, Michal" , "Erkiaga Elorza, Ibai" , "luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com" , Neal Frager via buildroot Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 05:29:47 +0000 "Frager, Neal" wrote: > Thank you for your research. I had not looked into how to fix > newlib, so that it installs to the correct place to begin with. > > From my side, I think patching newlib is clearly better because we > can try to upstream the patch to newlib. Once upstream, no patch or > fix up hack will be needed anymore when we bump to a newer newlib > version. > > I will test this patch with your branch as well to verify that we can > remove my fix up post installation hack. If this patch works, I > propose going with the patch. Well, the thing is that there is probably a reason why upstream does not install headers/libs in the standard location and decides to go with this custom tooldir thing. So I'm really not sure changing this will be upstreamable. Or perhaps by making it configurable, so that it can be overridden using a ./configure option? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot