All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com,
	kernel-team@meta.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:24:32 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231220072529.1036099-2-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231220072529.1036099-1-tj@kernel.org>

max_active is a workqueue-wide setting and the configured value is stored in
wq->saved_max_active; however, the effective value was stored in
pwq->max_active. While this is harmless, it makes max_active update process
more complicated and gets in the way of the planned max_active semantic
updates for unbound workqueues.

This patches moves pwq->max_active to wq->max_active. This simplifies the
code and makes freezing and noop max_active updates cheaper too. No
user-visible behavior change is intended.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 2989b57e154a..0e5dbeeb5778 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ struct pool_workqueue {
 	 * is marked with WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE iff it is in pwq->inactive_works.
 	 */
 	int			nr_active;	/* L: nr of active works */
-	int			max_active;	/* L: max active works */
 	struct list_head	inactive_works;	/* L: inactive works */
 	struct list_head	pwqs_node;	/* WR: node on wq->pwqs */
 	struct list_head	mayday_node;	/* MD: node on wq->maydays */
@@ -298,7 +297,8 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
 	struct worker		*rescuer;	/* MD: rescue worker */
 
 	int			nr_drainers;	/* WQ: drain in progress */
-	int			saved_max_active; /* WQ: saved pwq max_active */
+	int			max_active;	/* WQ: max active works */
+	int			saved_max_active; /* WQ: saved max_active */
 
 	struct workqueue_attrs	*unbound_attrs;	/* PW: only for unbound wqs */
 	struct pool_workqueue	*dfl_pwq;	/* PW: only for unbound wqs */
@@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ static void pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, unsigned long work_
 		pwq->nr_active--;
 		if (!list_empty(&pwq->inactive_works)) {
 			/* one down, submit an inactive one */
-			if (pwq->nr_active < pwq->max_active)
+			if (pwq->nr_active < pwq->wq->max_active)
 				pwq_activate_first_inactive(pwq);
 		}
 	}
@@ -1787,7 +1787,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	pwq->nr_in_flight[pwq->work_color]++;
 	work_flags = work_color_to_flags(pwq->work_color);
 
-	if (likely(pwq->nr_active < pwq->max_active)) {
+	if (likely(pwq->nr_active < pwq->wq->max_active)) {
 		if (list_empty(&pool->worklist))
 			pool->watchdog_ts = jiffies;
 
@@ -4136,50 +4136,6 @@ static void pwq_release_workfn(struct kthread_work *work)
 	}
 }
 
-/**
- * pwq_adjust_max_active - update a pwq's max_active to the current setting
- * @pwq: target pool_workqueue
- *
- * If @pwq isn't freezing, set @pwq->max_active to the associated
- * workqueue's saved_max_active and activate inactive work items
- * accordingly.  If @pwq is freezing, clear @pwq->max_active to zero.
- */
-static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
-{
-	struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq;
-	bool freezable = wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	/* for @wq->saved_max_active */
-	lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
-
-	/* fast exit for non-freezable wqs */
-	if (!freezable && pwq->max_active == wq->saved_max_active)
-		return;
-
-	/* this function can be called during early boot w/ irq disabled */
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
-
-	/*
-	 * During [un]freezing, the caller is responsible for ensuring that
-	 * this function is called at least once after @workqueue_freezing
-	 * is updated and visible.
-	 */
-	if (!freezable || !workqueue_freezing) {
-		pwq->max_active = wq->saved_max_active;
-
-		while (!list_empty(&pwq->inactive_works) &&
-		       pwq->nr_active < pwq->max_active)
-			pwq_activate_first_inactive(pwq);
-
-		kick_pool(pwq->pool);
-	} else {
-		pwq->max_active = 0;
-	}
-
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
-}
-
 /* initialize newly allocated @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */
 static void init_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 		     struct worker_pool *pool)
@@ -4212,9 +4168,6 @@ static void link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
 	/* set the matching work_color */
 	pwq->work_color = wq->work_color;
 
-	/* sync max_active to the current setting */
-	pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
-
 	/* link in @pwq */
 	list_add_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs);
 }
@@ -4665,6 +4618,46 @@ static int init_rescuer(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/**
+ * wq_adjust_max_active - update a wq's max_active to the current setting
+ * @wq: target workqueue
+ *
+ * If @wq isn't freezing, set @wq->max_active to the saved_max_active and
+ * activate inactive work items accordingly. If @wq is freezing, clear
+ * @wq->max_active to zero.
+ */
+static void wq_adjust_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
+{
+	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
+
+	if ((wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE) && workqueue_freezing) {
+		wq->max_active = 0;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (wq->max_active == wq->saved_max_active)
+		return;
+
+	wq->max_active = wq->saved_max_active;
+
+	for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) {
+		unsigned long flags;
+
+		/* this function can be called during early boot w/ irq disabled */
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
+
+		while (!list_empty(&pwq->inactive_works) &&
+		       pwq->nr_active < wq->max_active)
+			pwq_activate_first_inactive(pwq);
+
+		kick_pool(pwq->pool);
+
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
+	}
+}
+
 __printf(1, 4)
 struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue(const char *fmt,
 					 unsigned int flags,
@@ -4672,7 +4665,6 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue(const char *fmt,
 {
 	va_list args;
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
-	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
 
 	/*
 	 * Unbound && max_active == 1 used to imply ordered, which is no longer
@@ -4707,6 +4699,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue(const char *fmt,
 
 	/* init wq */
 	wq->flags = flags;
+	wq->max_active = max_active;
 	wq->saved_max_active = max_active;
 	mutex_init(&wq->mutex);
 	atomic_set(&wq->nr_pwqs_to_flush, 0);
@@ -4735,8 +4728,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue(const char *fmt,
 	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
 	mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
-	for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
-		pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
+	wq_adjust_max_active(wq);
 	mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 
 	list_add_tail_rcu(&wq->list, &workqueues);
@@ -4874,8 +4866,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(destroy_workqueue);
  */
 void workqueue_set_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int max_active)
 {
-	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
-
 	/* disallow meddling with max_active for ordered workqueues */
 	if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT))
 		return;
@@ -4886,10 +4876,7 @@ void workqueue_set_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int max_active)
 
 	wq->flags &= ~__WQ_ORDERED;
 	wq->saved_max_active = max_active;
-
-	for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
-		pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
-
+	wq_adjust_max_active(wq);
 	mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(workqueue_set_max_active);
@@ -5135,8 +5122,8 @@ static void show_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
 	pr_info("  pwq %d:", pool->id);
 	pr_cont_pool_info(pool);
 
-	pr_cont(" active=%d/%d refcnt=%d%s\n",
-		pwq->nr_active, pwq->max_active, pwq->refcnt,
+	pr_cont(" active=%d refcnt=%d%s\n",
+		pwq->nr_active, pwq->refcnt,
 		!list_empty(&pwq->mayday_node) ? " MAYDAY" : "");
 
 	hash_for_each(pool->busy_hash, bkt, worker, hentry) {
@@ -5684,7 +5671,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_on_cpu_safe_key);
 void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)
 {
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
-	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
 
 	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
@@ -5693,8 +5679,7 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)
 
 	list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
 		mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
-		for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
-			pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
+		wq_adjust_max_active(wq);
 		mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 	}
 
@@ -5759,7 +5744,6 @@ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void)
 void thaw_workqueues(void)
 {
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
-	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
 
 	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
@@ -5771,8 +5755,7 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void)
 	/* restore max_active and repopulate worklist */
 	list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
 		mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
-		for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
-			pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
+		wq_adjust_max_active(wq);
 		mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 	}
 
-- 
2.43.0


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-20  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-20  7:24 [PATCHSET wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2023-12-26  9:13   ` [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:05     ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-26 21:36       ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] workqueue: Factor out pwq_is_empty() Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: Replace pwq_activate_inactive_work() with [__]pwq_activate_work() Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] workqueue: Move nr_active handling into helpers Tejun Heo
2023-12-26  9:12   ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:06     ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: Make wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs while activating Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 06/10] workqueue: Add first_possible_node and node_nr_cpus[] Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: Move pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() to the end of work item handling Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: Introduce struct wq_node_nr_active Tejun Heo
2023-12-26  9:14   ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:12     ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] workqueue: Reimplement ordered workqueue using shared nr_active Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:18   ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  9:20 ` [PATCHSET wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-21 23:01   ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-22  8:04     ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-22  9:08       ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-05  2:44 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-12  0:49   ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:17     ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-15  5:46     ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-16 21:04       ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-30  2:24         ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-30 16:11           ` Tejun Heo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-25 17:05 [PATCHSET v3 wq/for-6.9] " Tejun Heo
2024-01-25 17:05 ` [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231220072529.1036099-2-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.