From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B03ACA68 for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 18:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="VqWJHY89" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1703441617; x=1734977617; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=ocrrjhfwm2JP3wKLiTvIlbxxnn2b01d17w0X+yU6Pfc=; b=VqWJHY89sjt9DGv5cKBazPLH2zrDdr1XYA7XWrye9lOF3HW67/1Kv2Yh eCCJK0RC2fGk7J+ClU8pxLEBrUg0IRPRrKbleppV3V8n0keKkL3+82L2+ 8B/uUWlsfi9BOyA/c7RFDqzI+hhzAdLpwzyjwsHPSPUIRhRcek7tplkl1 FtLt+CSzSRDmWnusbGf875g7XqHzak0C1PnTSRfwHxvbkcNgU8OkFHugu yMtdrs3U67PRU0BBbi3xant2elv8lcayRcNaERSUD7k2BYaq1Pimgo1tJ PXOSQ0WwxJBUWteHP2mAlUq5dvHU5rlKZbQEMCadEFIuaIrTjZdEU6BOf w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10934"; a="376384278" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,301,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="376384278" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Dec 2023 10:13:36 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10934"; a="868212613" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,301,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="868212613" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b07ab15da5fe) ([10.239.97.151]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Dec 2023 10:13:35 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b07ab15da5fe with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rHSyK-000CUu-0R; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 18:13:17 +0000 Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 02:12:16 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner Subject: arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c:26:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_irq_stack_backing_store' was not declared. Should it be static? Message-ID: <202312250248.UgnvTAFE-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master head: 861deac3b092f37b2c5e6871732f3e11486f7082 commit: e6401c13093173aad709a5c6de00cf8d692ee786 x86/irq/64: Split the IRQ stack into its own pages date: 4 years, 8 months ago config: x86_64-randconfig-122-20231101 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231225/202312250248.UgnvTAFE-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231225/202312250248.UgnvTAFE-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312250248.UgnvTAFE-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c:26:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_irq_stack_backing_store' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/__pcpu_scope_irq_stack_backing_store +26 arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c 25 > 26 DEFINE_PER_CPU_PAGE_ALIGNED(struct irq_stack, irq_stack_backing_store) __visible; 27 DECLARE_INIT_PER_CPU(irq_stack_backing_store); 28 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki